Two differing presentations of optic nerve head drusen.

D Gay; S Boyer

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11575696

Two differing presentations of optic nerve head drusen.

D Gay·S Boyer

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optic nerve head drusen was recognized histologically in 1858 by Heinrich Muller The majority of optic nerve head drusen cases have been benign in nature. However, optic nerve head drusen can be visually devastating. CASE REPORTS: Two patients were diagnosed with optic nerve head drusen. They were similar in age and each had a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 OU. Although the diagnosis was the same, the disease affected each person very differently. One is currently asymptomatic; the other is legally blind secondary to severely constricted visual fields. These cases demonstrate the diversity of visual effects produced by optic nerve head drusen. Appropriate ocular workup, including visual fields, B-scan ultrasonography, computed tomography, and other tests, are presented. CONCLUSION: There is no existing treatment for optic nerve head drusen. Proper diagnosis and patient education is the best-available modality of care. Patients need to be aware of potential complications which, while rare, can affect vision. Visual-field testing can aid in monitoring for subtle changes in vision.

Explore related subjects

Blindness Diagnosis, Differential Humans Male Middle Aged Optic Disk Drusen Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasonography Visual Acuity Visual Field Tests Visual Fields Case Reports Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D Gay, S Boyer. 2001. Two differing presentations of optic nerve head drusen.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11575696/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Lack of NPHP2 mutations in a newborn infant with Joubert syndrome-related disorder presenting as end-stage renal disease.

A newborn infant with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to nephronophthisis (NPHP) developed episodes of tachypnea, alternating with apnea, and abnormal eye movements. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the midbrain demonstrated the characteristic appearance of molar tooth sign on axial images, consistent with the diagnosis of Joubert syndrome (JBTS). The DNA sequence analysis of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected no mutations in the NPHP2 (INVS) gene in this child, suggesting that new mutant genes might be responsible for the early onset of ESRD in infantile NPHP with features of JBTS.

Blindness↗

PubMed2007

Radiology quiz case 2. Blindness secondary to nasal polyposis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Blindness↗

PubMed2006

Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Nakuru district, Kenya.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of avoidable blindness in > or =50-year-olds in Nakuru district, Kenya, and to evaluate the Rapid Assessment for Avoidable Blindness (RAAB), a new methodology to measure the magnitude and causes of blindness. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-six clusters of 50 people 50 years or older were selected by probability proportionate to size sampling of clusters. Households within clusters were selected through compact segment sampling. Three thousand seven hundred eighty-four eligible subjects were selected, of whom 3503 (92.6%) were examined. METHODS: Participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination in their homes by an ophthalmologist, including measurement of visual acuity (VA) with a tumbling-E chart and the diagnosis of the principal cause of visual impairment. Those who had undergone cataract surgery were questioned about the details of the operation and their satisfaction with surgery. Those who were visually impaired from cataract were asked why they had not gone for surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and principal cause of VA<6/18. RESULTS: The prevalence of bilateral blindness (presenting VA < 3/60) was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5%-2.4%), and prevalence of bilateral visual impairment (VA of <6/18-> or =6/60) was 5.8% (95% CI, 4.8%-6.8%) in the sample. Definite avoidable causes of blindness (i.e., cataract, refractive error, trachoma, and corneal scarring) were responsible for 69.6% of bilateral blindness and 74.9% of bilateral visual impairment. Cataract was the major cause of blindness (42.0%) and visual impairment (36.0%). The cataract surgical coverage was high, with 78% of those with bilateral cataract who needed surgery having had surgery at VA<3/60. The quality of surgery was of concern because 22% of the 222 eyes that had undergone cataract surgery had VA<6/60 with best correction. The main barriers to surgery were lack of awareness and cost. The RAAB methodology was easy to use, and each team could visit one cluster per day. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of blindness in > or =50-year-olds in Nakuru district was low, in part due to the high cataract surgical coverage. The RAAB is easy to use and inexpensive and provides information about the magnitude and causes of avoidable blindness that can be used for planning and monitoring eye care services.

Blindness↗