PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11575718

ZD-1839 (AstraZeneca).

P Norman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AstraZeneca is developing ZD-1839, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR1) tyrosine kinase, for potential treatment of cancers which overexpress EGF receptors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pancreatic cancer [196279], [270898]. Phase III studies had started by August 2000 [349551], [350295], [353050], [377656], with first results being expected at the 2001 meetings of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) and the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The US FDA has issued ZD-1839 with Fast Track status [350295], [353050]. In September 2000, the company expected global NDA filing to take place at the end of 2001, with launch in the next four to five years [383469]. In January 1999, ABN Amro predicted sales of US $25 million in 2004 rising to $82 million in 2005 [316250]. In March 1999, Lehman Brothers predicted a 30% probability that the drug would reach worldwide markets and be launched onto the market in 2004 [336599]. In June 2000, Deutsche Bank predicted sales of US $8 million in 2002, rising to $100 million in 2003 [374500]. In September 2000, analysts Merrill Lynch predicted a launch in 2002 with sales estimated at UK 50 million pounds, rising to 360 million pounds in 2004, while in December 2000, the analysts predicted a filing date in the fourth quarter of 2001 [383742], [396280]. Also in December 2000, Lehman Brothers predicted a filing date late in 2001, and a possible Fast Track review. They also estimated peak sales of US $1 billion [394606].

Explore related subjects

AnemiaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDiarrheaDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug ToleranceDrugs, InvestigationalEconomics, PharmaceuticalEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsGefitinibHumansLung NeoplasmsNauseaPancreatic NeoplasmsQuinazolinesTumor Cells, CulturedComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Norman. 2001. ZD-1839 (AstraZeneca).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11575718/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Regulation of protein synthesis by the heme-regulated eIF2alpha kinase: relevance to anemias.

During erythroid differentiation and maturation, it is critical that the 3 components of hemoglobin, alpha-globin, beta-globin, and heme, are made in proper stoichiometry to form stable hemoglobin. Heme-regulated translation mediated by the heme-regulated inhibitor kinase (HRI) provides one major mechanism that ensures balanced synthesis of globins and heme. HRI phosphorylates the alpha-subunit of eukaryotic translational initiation factor 2 (eLF2alpha) in heme deficiency, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis globally. In this manner, HRI serves as a feedback inhibitor of globin synthesis by sensing the intracellular concentration of heme through its heme-binding domains. HRI is essential not only for the translational regulation of globins, but also for the survival of erythroid precursors in iron deficiency. Recently, the protective function of HRI has also been demonstrated in murine models of erythropoietic protoporphyria and beta-thalassemia. In these 3 anemias, HRI is essential in determining red blood cell size, number, and hemoglobin content per cell. Translational regulation by HRI is critical to reduce excess synthesis of globin proteins or heme under nonoptimal disease states, and thus reduces the severity of these diseases. The protective role of HRI may be more common among red cell disorders.

Anemia↗
PubMed2007

A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.

A new test for the detection of publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data is proposed. The test statistic is based on observed and expected cell frequencies, and the variance of the observed cell frequencies. These quantities are utilized in a rank correlation test. Type I error rate and power of the test are evaluated in simulations; results are compared to those of two other commonly used test procedures. Sample sizes were generated according to findings in a survey of eight German medical journals. Simulation results indicate that, in contrast to existing test procedures, the new test holds the prescribed significance level when data are sparse. However, the power of all tests is low in many situations of practical importance.

Anemia↗
PubMed2007

Center effects in anemia management of dialysis patients.

This study set out to determine whether there is a center effect on anemia management in hemodialysis patients. The US Renal Data System and Medicare standard analysis files were analyzed. Between-center variation and within-facility correlations in hematocrit values were examined in two separate data sets (years 2000 and 2001) and compared with simulated samples that were composed of random values that assumed no center effect. Mixed-effect models were used to adjust for multiple factors and quantify the within-facility correlation in hematocrit values. Expected hematocrit values were compared in patients who underwent dialysis at poor and superior performing facilities with fixed characteristics including epoetin alpha dosing. There was a wider center variation in hematocrit for the actual versus simulated data and a coefficient of variation of 4.1% for the former versus 1.7% for the latter, in both years. The within-facility correlation for hematocrit was 0.053 (95% confidence interval 0.050 to 0.056; P < 0.001) in 2000 with similar values in 2001 but no within-facility correlation in the simulated data. The impact of these findings was demonstrated with a difference in expected hematocrit for a patient who was treated with fixed-dosage epoetin alpha in the poorest versus best performing units (mean difference in expected hematocrit 3.06; 95% confidence interval 3.03 to 3.09; P < 0.001). Key attributes of a center effect on anemia management in hemodialysis have been identified. The presence of a center effect suggests that there are facility-specific processes that influence performance in dialysis anemia management and are independent of commonly titrated inputs, such as dosing of erythropoietic agents.

Anemia↗