PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11602455

Setting the stage.

Abstract

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) occurs during 25% to 50% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hemodialysis (HD) treatments. The development of IDH signals both technology- and patient-dependent limitations expressed across a broad range of symptoms, from nausea and muscle cramps to ischemic injury. While traditional thinking has emphasized the link between hypertension and cardio-cerebrovascular injury, more recent studies of ESRD patients have stimulated significant interest in hypotension and poor outcomes. Theoretically, hypotension can contribute to the increased relative risk of death in ESRD by several mechanisms, which include acute coronary syndrome, autoregulation dysfunction, ischemia, and arrhythmogenicity. Endothelial abnormalities (increased procoagulation, thrombogenecity risk, and alterations in coronary flow reserve) and altered vascular distribution within the myocardium provide an environment for vascular injury. The current symposia will examine the pathophysiology of IDH, the specific HD prescription modifications to prevent IDH, and newer pharmacologic interventions to treat IDH and will highlight the approach to several clinical cases based on the information presented. It is becoming increasingly important to identify patients at "high risk" for IDH, to customize the HD prescription to the individual patient, to use drug therapy to prevent IDH events, and to track the prevalence of chronic hypotension and the incidence of IDH complications in the dialysis unit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Schreiber. 2001. Setting the stage.. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.2001.28089

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Graphical models for multivariate time series from intensive care monitoring.

Nowadays physicians are confronted with high-dimensional data generated by clinical information systems. The proper extraction and interpretation of the information contained in such massive data sets, which are often observed with high sampling frequencies, can hardly be done by experience only. This yields new perspectives of data recording and also sets a new challenge for statistical methodology. Recently graphical models have been developed for analysing the partial correlations between the components of multivariate time series. We apply this technique to the haemodynamic system of critically ill patients monitored in intensive care. In this way we can appraise the practical value of the new procedure by re-identifying known associations within the haemodynamic system. From separate analyses for different pathophysiological states we can even conclude that distinct clinical states are characterized by distinct partial correlation structures. Hence, this technique seems useful for automatic statistical analysis of high-dimensional physiological time series and it can provide new insights into physiological mechanisms. Moreover, we can use it to achieve an adequate dimension reduction of the variables needed for online monitoring at the bedside.

Blood Pressure↗

Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes.

Among clinical trials assessing a given treatment, often parallel and cross-over designs are used together. In the first paper of a series of three, we explore two methods to pool continuous outcomes in a meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over trial designs: the weighted mean difference (WMD) and the standardized weighted mean difference (SWMD). The combined design meta-analytic formulae are based on a weighted average of the two design treatment estimates. A random effects model can be implemented. Both WMD and SWMD can be used, the choice of the method is determined by the type of outcomes obtained in the trials. Compared to the number of included subjects, the relative weight of the cross-over design is large in combined-design meta-analysis. Differences in the weight estimation between WMD and SWMD can also accentuate the relative weight of cross-over trials, which must be considered a case of design-specific bias.

Blood Pressure↗

Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. III: The issue of carry-over.

In meta-analysis combining results from parallel and cross-over trials, there is a risk of bias originating from the carry-over effect in cross-over trials. When pooling treatment effects estimated from parallel trials and two-period two-treatment cross-over trials, meta-analytic estimators of treatment effect can be obtained from the combination of parallel trial results either with cross-over trial results based on data of the first period only or with cross-over trial results analysed with data from both periods. Taking data from the first cross-over period protects against carry-over but gives less efficient treatment estimators and may lead to selection bias. This study evaluates in terms of variance reduction and mean square error the cost of calculating meta-analysis estimates with data from the first period instead of data from the two cross-over periods. If the information on cross-over sequence is available, we recommend performing two combined design meta-analyses, one using the first cross-over period data and one based on data from both cross-over periods. To investigate simultaneously the statistical significance of these two estimators as well as the carry-over at meta-analysis level, a method based on a multivariate analysis of the meta-analytic treatment effect and carry-over estimates is proposed.

Blood Pressure↗