PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11604736

Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity.

A T McCray·A Burgun·O Bodenreider
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The conceptual complexity of a domain can make it difficult for users of information systems to comprehend and interact with the knowledge embedded in those systems. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) currently integrates over 730,000 biomedical concepts from more than fifty biomedical vocabularies. The UMLS semantic network reduces the complexity of this construct by grouping concepts according to the semantic types that have been assigned to them. For certain purposes, however, an even smaller and coarser-grained set of semantic type groupings may be desirable. In this paper, we discuss our approach to creating such a set. We present six basic principles, and then apply those principles in aggregating the existing 134 semantic types into a set of 15 groupings. We present some of the difficulties we encountered and the consequences of the decisions we have made. We discuss some possible uses of the semantic groups, and we conclude with implications for future work.

Explore related subjects

SemanticsUnified Medical Language SystemVocabulary, ControlledJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A T McCray, A Burgun, O Bodenreider. 2001. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11604736/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

ConceptDrift: leveraging spatial, temporal and semantic evolution of biomedical concepts for hypothesis generation.

MOTIVATION: Hypothesis generation is a fundamental problem in biomedical text mining that aims to generate ideas that are new, interesting, and plausible by discovering unexplored links between biomedical concepts. Despite significant advances made by existing approaches, they do not fully leverage the evolutionary properties of biomedical concepts. This is limiting because scientific knowledge continually evolves over time, with new facts being added and old ones becoming obsolete. Thus, it is crucial to capture the evolutionary properties of biomedical concepts from multiple perspectives (e.g. spatial, temporal, and semantic) to generate hypotheses that reflect the up-to-date information landscape of the biomedical domain. RESULTS: We introduce a novel framework, ConceptDrift, that models the hypothesis generation task as a sequence of temporal graphlets and simultaneously encodes spatial, temporal, and semantic change. Unlike existing approaches that treat these dimensions independently, ConceptDrift is the first to provide a holistic understanding of concept evolution by integrating them into a unified framework. Grounded in the theories of the Distributional Hypothesis and Conceptual Change, our method adapts these principles to the unique challenges of large-scale biomedical literature. We conduct extensive experiments across multiple datasets and demonstrate that ConceptDrift consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in generating accurate and meaningful hypotheses. Our framework shows immediate practical benefits for web-based literature mining tools in life sciences and biomedicine, offering more robust and predictive feature representations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/amir-hassan25/ConceptDrift (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29975476).

Semantics↗
PubMed2002

Using the metaschema to audit UMLS classification errors.

The Unified Medical Language System integrates about 800,000 concepts from 99 biomedical terminologies. Each concept is assigned to at least one semantic type of the Semantic Network. During the integration, it is unavoidable that some classification errors and inconsistencies will be introduced. In this paper, we present an auditing technique to find such errors and inconsistencies. Our technique is based on an expert reviewing the pure intersections of meta-semantic types of the metaschema, a compact abstract view of the Semantic Network. Results regarding the pure intersections are reported. The analysis results for pure intersections with 1 to 6 concepts are presented. Various kinds of errors are identified.

Semantics↗