PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11604821

Why implementing EPR's does not bring about organizational changes--a qualitative approach.

Abstract

Politicians and hospital management in Sweden and Denmark focus on IT and especially Electronic Patient Record, EPR as a tool for changes that will lead to better economy as well as better quality and service for the patients. These changes are not direct effects of the new medium for patient records but indirect effects due to the possibilities embedded in the new technology. This paper describes how clinicians as well as management in two hospitals interpret and uses the EPR. The findings clearly show that the intended changes i.e. the objectives for the implementation, never occurred. The interpretation of the interviews makes it possible to understand that one of the reasons is the lack of correlation between the conception and use of the EPR on one hand and the fact that the management and the clinicians do not share the same vision and mental picture of the future organization on the other.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R E Nikula. 2001. Why implementing EPR's does not bring about organizational changes--a qualitative approach.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11604821/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system in pathology: effects of external representation on performance gains, metacognition, and acceptance.

OBJECTIVE: Determine effects of computer-based tutoring on diagnostic performance gains, meta-cognition, and acceptance using two different problem representations. Describe impact of tutoring on spectrum of diagnostic skills required for task performance. Identify key features of student-tutor interaction contributing to learning gains. DESIGN: Prospective, between-subjects study, controlled for participant level of training. Resident physicians in two academic pathology programs spent four hours using one of two interfaces which differed mainly in external problem representation. The case-focused representation provided an open-learning environment in which students were free to explore evidence-hypothesis relationships within a case, but could not visualize the entire diagnostic space. The knowledge-focused representation provided an interactive representation of the entire diagnostic space, which more tightly constrained student actions. MEASUREMENTS: Metrics included results of pretest, post-test and retention-test for multiple choice and case diagnosis tests, ratios of performance to student reported certainty, results of participant survey, learning curves, and interaction behaviors during tutoring. RESULTS: Students had highly significant learning gains after one tutoring session. Learning was retained at one week. There were no differences between the two interfaces in learning gains on post-test or retention test. Only students in the knowledge-focused interface exhibited significant metacognitive gains from pretest to post-test and pretest to retention test. Students rated the knowledge-focused interface significantly higher than the case-focused interface. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive tutoring is associated with improved diagnostic performance in a complex medical domain. The effect is retained at one-week post-training. Knowledge-focused external problem representation shows an advantage over case-focused representation for metacognitive effects and user acceptance.

Attitude to Computers↗