PubMed · 11631023
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T Holste, G Keil. 1982. [Not Available].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11631023/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The threat from chemical warfare agents such as nerve agents against civilians has traditionally been considered irrelevant. Following the recent terrorist attacks in the US on 11 September 2001 and in Madrid, Spain on 11 March 2004, the threat from such weapons is taken seriously. Hospitals must therefore be prepared to take care of civilian victims. Emergency preparedness implies education and training of healthcare professionals, stocking of antidotes, and training of personnel. This involves decontamination of patients, establishment of routines to avoid contamination of hospitals, and the ability to determine if patients and first responders are contaminated with chemicals and to avoid such contamination. Treatment against nerve agents includes atropine, acetylcholinesterase reactivators (obidoxime or pralidoxime) and benzodiazepines (diazepam). Because these drugs are not sufficiently effective in protecting the brain, new and more effective countermeasures must be developed.
Although occupational uses of the high production volume (HPV) chemical ethylene glycol (EG) have not been associated with adverse effects, there are case reports where humans have either intentionally or accidentally ingested large quantities of EG, primarily from antifreeze. The acute toxicity of EG can proceed through three stages, each associated with a different metabolite: central nervous system depression (ethylene glycol), cardiopulmonary effects associated with metabolic acidosis (glycolic acid), and ultimately renal toxicity (oxalic acid), depending on the total amounts consumed and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model developed in a companion paper (Corley et al., 2005). Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for ethylene glycol and its metabolite, glycolic acid, in rats and humans. Toxicol. Sci., in press 2005) was refined in this study to include clinically relevant treatment regimens for EG poisoning such as hemodialysis or metabolic inhibition with either ethanol or fomepizole. Such modifications enabled the model to describe data from several human case reports, confirming the ability of the previous model to describe the pharmacokinetics of EG and its metabolite, glycolic acid, in humans across a broad range of doses and multiple exposure routes. By integrating the case report data sets with controlled studies in this PBPK model, it was demonstrated that fomepizole, if administered early enough in a clinical situation, can be more effective than ethanol or hemodialysis in preventing the metabolism of EG to more toxic metabolites. Hemodialysis remains an important option, however, if treatment is instituted after a significant amount of EG is metabolized or if renal toxicity has occurred.
BACKGROUND: Acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning causes tens of thousands of deaths each year across the developing world. Standard treatment involves administration of intravenous atropine and oxime to counter acetylcholinesterase inhibition at the synapse. The usefulness of oximes, such as pralidoxime and obidoxime, has been challenged over the past 20 years by physicians in many parts of the world, who have failed to see benefit in their clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To find the clinical trial evidence for oximes producing clinical benefit in acute organophosphorus pesticide-poisoned patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We carried out a systematic search to find randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of oximes in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning, using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. All articles with the text words 'organophosphate' or 'oxime' together with 'poisoning' or 'overdose' were examined. (Search last updated November 2003.) SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles that could possibly be randomised clinical trials were retrieved to determine if this was the case. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The published methodology of the possible RCTs located is not clear. One was found in abstract form only and two other published trials also had many gaps in the published methodology. We have attempted to contact the principal authors of all three trials but have been unable to obtain further information. MAIN RESULTS: Two RCTs have been published, involving 182 patients treated with pralidoxime. These trials did not find benefit. However, the studies did not take into account a number of issues important for outcome and the methodology is unclear. Therefore, a generalised statement on effectiveness cannot be supported by the published results. In particular, characteristics at baseline were not evenly balanced, the dose of oxime was much lower than recommended in guidelines, there were substantial delays to treatment, and the type of organophosphate was not taken into account. The abstract of the third trial, a small possible RCT, is uninterpretable without further data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is insufficient to indicate whether oximes are harmful or beneficial in the management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. A much larger RCT is required to compare the World Health Organization recommended pralidoxime regimen (>30 mg/kg bolus followed by >8 mg/kg/hr infusion) with placebo. There are many theoretical and practical reasons why oximes may not be useful to patients with overwhelming self-poisoning. Such a study will need to be designed with pre-defined sub-group analysis to allow identification of patient sub-groups that may benefit from oximes.