PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11640528

[Controlling science and technology, 1965-2000].

Abstract

Over the last 35 years ideas about the development of science and technology have taken a new turn. The optimistic period of post-war reconstruction that lasted until the nineteen sixties saw science and technology as almost autonomous phenomena and as the source of our wealth. This view came to be criticized in the seventies, and the social impact of the intertwined development of science and technology came under scrutiny. Discussions about nuclear power, nuclear weapons and environmental problems induced the first attempts to control the development of science and technology. These attempts were mainly directed at minimalizing side effects, yet at the same time an increasing need was felt to adapt the course of scientific and technological developments to social needs. Governments were urged to devise mechanisms to institutionalize attempts in this direction. Social groupings began to use science and technology as a means to achieve their own ends (e.g., alternative technology). In particular, there was a growing interest in the possibilities of influencing decision-making with regard to science and technology. This paper presents an overview of these developments and illustrates the growing involvement of outside parties. Multinational companies, science organizations and the universities have thus paid increasing attention to forms of decision making that aim to give civilians a more important role.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E J Tuininga. 2000. [Controlling science and technology, 1965-2000].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11640528/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Addressing racism as a clinical competence: Robert Wilson, Jr. (1867-1946).

Addressing health inequity is now recognized as a clinical competency in medical education. We examined the career and writings of Robert Wilson Jr. (1867-1946), longtime dean of the Medical College of the State of South Carolina during the Jim Crow Era, using primary and secondary sources within the context of systemic and structural racism, particularly in South Carolina. Wilson used public health data to refute the "Black Extinction Hypothesis" rooted in social Darwinism. He challenged assumptions of inherent Black susceptibility to tuberculosis, linking disease instead to social determinants of health. He also identified disproportionate mortality from kidney and cardiovascular disease among Black populations, anticipating modern health disparities research. Wilson further acknowledged systemic injustice and implicated structural conditions, including housing, in shaping outcomes. In an era of continuing health inequity and racial health disparities, Wilson applied empirical evidence to reject biological determinism, identify outcomes disparities, and advocate for racial justice.

History, 20th Century↗

A Donald F. Hunt Story (John's Version).

A personal narrative of my time in the Hunt laboratory and beyond is provided. The impact of the Hunt laboratory on the analysis of peptides and proteins by tandem mass spectrometry is described in the context of the time.

History, 20th Century↗

[From the Gestaltkreis to synergetics: irreversible structural and dynamic functional couplings].

With the present contribution, we attempt to merge the work of several generations of physiology and psychosomatics. The common denominator in an array of observation levels appear in these works as the relationship between irreversible-structural and dynamic-functional couplings and synchronisations. In this context, studies on the level of the common brainstem system appear to be the base for a neuro-bio-psychic self-organisation. Studies culled from psychosomatics of Heidelberg, notably the Gestaltkreis theory, the Methodenkreis (methodological loop), the Bipersonalität (bipersonality), and the Simultandiagnostik (simultaneous diagnostics) exhibit the origin of complex functions which have been analyzed and quantified employing nonlinear methods developed in synergetics. Relevance of coupling and synchronisation, desynchronisation, resp., is, however, not limited to the scope of psychosomatic medicine. Fixed or functional, they are essential constituents to neurophysiological processes, such as association, dissociation, resp. This equally holds for evidence based medicine which is to benefit from any dynamic process analysis.

History, 20th Century↗