PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11640641

[Not Available].

Abstract

This essay focuses on a moment when in medicine the prevailing static conception of disease was seen from a temporal perspective and conceived as a developmental process. Included in this discourse was Hahnemann's conception of homoeopathy. His conception combined two traditional systems of reading and interpreting signs of illness drawing a direct conclusion from a visible sign to a significant therapy while excluding causal-theoretical reflection about the meaning of signs. The basis of this idea is rooted in the general epistemological structure of the 18th century, in which knowledge was represented in the relation of a sign with meaning or significance. In contrast to the trinary structure of modern semiotics as exemplified by the Peircian terms "object, representamen and interpretant", medical semiotics and knowledge in the 18th century was instituted by the binary semantic relationship of representation. Thus, Hahnemann's roots in the intellectual world of the 18th century not only defined his contribution to the discourse, they may also explain his exclusion after the conceptual change of the early 19th century.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Hess. 1993. [Not Available].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11640641/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Inguinal hernia on the internet: a critical comparison of Germany and the UK.

Despite containing an increasing amount of medical information, the Internet provides only rare benefits for surgical patients. Using "inguinal hernia" as a catchword, an amateur search was imitated on the British Internet market. Sixty-five pages, standardised regarding quality and efficiency, were evaluated. A comparison to the German Internet market was added. In summary, the broad majority of the pages revealed poor results. Technical appearance, quality of content, and target grouping show big deficiencies. The applicable laws on the European market are not yet established. The ranking lists of the search engines do not reflect the quality of the pages. Patients need competent guides to process surgical information from the Internet. The establishment of specialised institutions to control surgical Web sites according to quality, content, and legality on the European level is urgent.

Germany↗