PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11642139

An incremental approach to a Web-based computerized medical record.

B Hood·J Clarke·R Crouch·M Wareham
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Acceptance of an electronic medical record within physician practices is a challenge that the Everett Clinic and the Wenatchee Valley Clinic in Washington State have chosen to approach incrementally. These two independent clinics, with 180 physicians each, joined forces in 1995 to form an information service organization, CliniTech Information Resources, to consolidate operation of their practice management and lab systems. With that done, in 1997 they asked CliniTech to come up with a solution to give physicians online access to clinical data in a way that didn't interrupt their work-flow or decrease their productivity--not a small order. The first HTML application was On Line Transcription, for viewing chart notes and radiology reports. Next, the On Line Patient Profile was developed to replace the face sheet. On Line Lab Results followed as a way to view results from the clinics' internal and reference lab systems. A single user interface was created in 2000 to link these components to the physician's schedule and clinical references. The new computerized medical record (CMR) has been embraced by the clinics' physicians (currently at 70 percent usage) and will continue to grow with additional results and images. Electronic signature capabilities for transcription and results are also slated for 2001 and will be the first change to how the physician practices.

Explore related subjects

Clinical Laboratory Information SystemsGroup PracticeHumansManagement Information SystemsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedOrganizational AffiliationPlanning TechniquesSoftwareSystems IntegrationWashingtonJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Hood, J Clarke, R Crouch, M Wareham. 2001. An incremental approach to a Web-based computerized medical record.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11642139/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality.

CONTEXT: Comparisons of risk-adjusted hospital performance often are important components of public reports, pay-for-performance programs, and quality improvement initiatives. Risk-adjustment equations used in these analyses must contain sufficient clinical detail to ensure accurate measurements of hospital quality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates of adding present on admission codes and numerical laboratory data to administrative claims data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Comparison of risk-adjustment equations for inpatient mortality from July 2000 through June 2003 derived by sequentially adding increasingly difficult-to-obtain clinical data to an administrative database of 188 Pennsylvania hospitals. Patients were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage, or pneumonia or underwent an abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or craniotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: C statistics as a measure of the discriminatory power of alternative risk-adjustment models (administrative, present on admission, laboratory, and clinical for each of the 5 conditions and 3 procedures). RESULTS: The mean (SD) c statistic for the administrative model was 0.79 (0.02). Adding present on admission codes and numerical laboratory data collected at the time of admission resulted in substantially improved risk-adjustment equations (mean [SD] c statistic of 0.84 [0.01] and 0.86 [0.01], respectively). Modest additional improvements were obtained by adding more complex and expensive to collect clinical data such as vital signs, blood culture results, key clinical findings, and composite scores abstracted from patients' medical records (mean [SD] c statistic of 0.88 [0.01]). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the value of adding present on admission codes and numerical laboratory values to administrative databases. Secondary abstraction of difficult-to-obtain key clinical findings adds little to the predictive power of risk-adjustment equations.

Clinical Laboratory Information Systems↗
PubMed2006

Definition of an XML markup language for clinical laboratory procedures and comparison with generic XML markup.

BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratory procedure manuals are typically maintained as word processor files and are inefficient to store and search, require substantial effort for review and updating, and integrate poorly with other laboratory information. Electronic document management systems could improve procedure management and utility. As a first step toward building such systems, we have developed a prototype electronic format for laboratory procedures using Extensible Markup Language (XML). METHODS: Representative laboratory procedures were analyzed to identify document structure and data elements. This information was used to create a markup vocabulary, CLP-ML, expressed as an XML Document Type Definition (DTD). To determine whether this markup provided advantages over generic markup, we compared procedures structured with CLP-ML or with the vocabulary of the Health Level Seven, Inc. (HL7) Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) narrative block. RESULTS: CLP-ML includes 124 XML tags and supports a variety of procedure types across different laboratory sections. When compared with a general-purpose markup vocabulary (CDA narrative block), CLP-ML documents were easier to edit and read, less complex structurally, and simpler to traverse for searching and retrieval. CONCLUSION: In combination with appropriate software, CLP-ML is designed to support electronic authoring, reviewing, distributing, and searching of clinical laboratory procedures from a central repository, decreasing procedure maintenance effort and increasing the utility of procedure information. A standard electronic procedure format could also allow laboratories and vendors to share procedures and procedure layouts, minimizing duplicative word processor editing. Our results suggest that laboratory-specific markup such as CLP-ML will provide greater benefit for such systems than generic markup.

Clinical Laboratory Information Systems↗