PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11644785

Panel backs animal testing alternatives.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Animal ExperimentationAnimal Testing AlternativesAnimal WelfareAnimalsFederal GovernmentGovernmentPeer ReviewPublic PolicyReference StandardsUnited StatesBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchNews

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1996-01-12. Panel backs animal testing alternatives.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11644785/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Field studies and the IACUC: protocol review, oversight, and occupational health and safety considerations.

Field studies involving animals, like other institutional research endeavors, are regulated and evaluated by an IACUC to insure that the protocols employed in those studies are consistent with the most humane care and use of animals. Unlike many other on-site research projects, however, field studies present unique logistical and other challenges to IACUC evaluation. The authors explore many of these challenges, including the special protocol considerations and idiosyncratic occupational health and safety concerns characteristic of field-study reviews.

Animal Experimentation↗