PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11673960

Layered and Hexagonal Aluminosilicate-Hexadecylamine Mesostructures: Solid State Transformation and Ionic Conductivity.

Sang Kyeong Yun·Joachim Maier
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Inorganic-organic hybrids of the aluminosilicate-hexadecylamine mesostructures (AHM) have been prepared by a sol-gel reaction of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and Al(NO(3))(3).9H(2)O mixtures in the presence of hexadecylamine (HDA) and LiNO(3). At an HDA concentration of [HDA]/([Si] + [Al]) = 0.3, both lamellar and hexagonal AHM structures were obtained, depending on the degree of Al substitution and LiNO(3) addition. Our synthetic work illustrates that the inorganic ingredient (LiNO(3)) as well as the sol-gel precursor (Al(NO(3))(3)) plays a crucial role in the selective formation of the lamellar or hexagonal AHM. Without an Al or a Li source, products obtained by the same method were all found to have exclusively the hexagonal structure. Studies using XRD, DSC, high-resolution TEM, and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) verified that the prepared lamellar AHMs undergo (i) a reversible melting of the HDA intercalates at 60 degrees C and then (ii) an irreversible structural transformation to their hexagonal analogues at higher temperature. The temperature dependence of the ionic conductivity (sigma) revealed a strong structural sensitivity. We discuss in more detail the conduction behavior of a [Si(17.1)Al(1.00)O(36.2)(Li(0.47)H(0.53))][HDA](21.0) product in its lamellar structure (exhibiting moderate conductivities of approximately 10(-)(7) S/cm below 50 degrees C), in its highly conductive HDA-melted metastable layered structure ( approximately 10(-)(4)-10(-)(3) S/cm in the region of 60-210 degrees C), and in its comparatively insulating hexagonal structure (10(-)(9)-10(-)(8) S/cm between 130 and 260 degrees C).

Explore related subjects

Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sang Kyeong Yun, Joachim Maier. 1999-02-08. Layered and Hexagonal Aluminosilicate-Hexadecylamine Mesostructures: Solid State Transformation and Ionic Conductivity.. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic980276w

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2027

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗