PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11687163

Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic rheumatic disease. Due to the consequences of the disease, physiotherapy is regarded to be an important part of the treatment. OBJECTIVES: The objective is to summarise the available scientific evidence on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions in the management of AS. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Trial register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Pedro up to February 2000 for all relevant publications, limited to English and Scandinavian languages. The reference lists of relevant articles were checked and the authors of included articles were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi randomised studies where the participants were patients with AS, classified by the New York criteria, and where at least one of the comparison groups received some kind of physiotherapy. The main outcomes of interest were spinal mobility, pain, stiffness, physical function and global assessment of change. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Investigators were contacted to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials were included with 241 participants, and all were assessed to have moderate to high risk of bias. Two trials compared the effect of supervised group physical therapy with an individualised home exercise program, and reported differences in favour of the supervised group. For pain and stiffness, the relative difference in change from baseline for the supervised group compared to the home exercise group was 50% after treatment. One trial compared an individual program of exercises and disease education with no intervention, and found differences in favour of the exercise group. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The tendency toward positive effects of physiotherapy, in the management of AS, call for further research in this field in order to reach sufficient evidence on which physiotherapy modalities and applications are to be recommended. New trials should address other physiotherapy interventions commonly used in practice. There is not sufficient evidence yet available to base recommendations for or against the use of physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Dagfinrud, K Hagen. 2001. Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis.. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002822

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI): an appraisal of validity in an outpatient sample.

In this study we examined the validity of the Assessment of Depression Inventory (ADI) using outpatient participants. The ADI Depression scale (Dep) was compared to three other measures used to assess depression: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Correlations between the ADI and these three measures were significant. An analysis of the discriminant ability of the ADI Dep scale resulted in sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive power, negative predictive power, hit rate, and area under the curve (92.3%) that were supportive of the scale's effectiveness. The ADI Feigning scale (Fg) was compared to the six PAI validity scales. The Fg scale correlated significantly with the PAI Negative Impression Management (NIM) and Positive Impression Management (PIM) scales, and the Malingering (MAL) and Defensive (DEF) indexes. Directionality was as would be predicted. The ADI did not correlate with the two PAI validity scales derived by discriminant analysis function.

Ambulatory Care↗

How normalised is HIV care in the UK? A survey of current practice and opinion.

OBJECTIVES: The prognosis for individuals infected with HIV has changed dramatically over the past 10 years, with patients living longer and requiring other specialist services. It is apparent that access of other healthcare professionals to clinical information about a patient's HIV care differs between centres in the UK. Lack of awareness of an individual's HIV status may compromise their clinical care. AIM: To establish current practice and identify the views of clinicians caring for patients infected with HIV. METHODS: Lead consultants in all genitourinary medicine departments in the UK were invited to complete a questionnaire regarding use of combined HIV and hospital notes and ability of general practitioners and other hospital specialists to access information about individual patient's HIV care. Clinician's opinions on the "normalisation" of HIV management were also sought. RESULTS: Combined notes (outpatient and inpatient) were used by 12% (16/130) of respondents. The patient's identifying number was used to request blood tests in 86%. Of the respondents, 42% had encountered difficulties in communication that affected delivery of care for an HIV-positive patient. CONCLUSIONS: Centres using combined notes identified a higher frequency of communication with other doctors and specialties, suggesting a higher standard of care. Physicians involved in HIV care should consider combining patients' HIV and hospital notes for improved clinical care.

Ambulatory Care↗