PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11702466

Tutorial on risk-adjusted P-charts.

F Alemi·D W Oliver
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Several books are available that describe how to construct control charts. Unfortunately none of these books show how to adjust control charts for the severity of the patients' illness. Without such adjustments control charts not only loose face validity but could lead to wrong conclusions. In this article we provide a step-by-step guide regarding how to control for changes in patients' severity of illness across time periods. We illustrate the use of the approach in examining falls in nursing homes. A control chart was constructed to compare observed falls to the residents' risk of fall measured on admission. Analysis led to conclusions radically different from an unadjusted chart.

Explore related subjects

Accidental FallsGuidelines as TopicHumansNursing HomesProbabilityPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AdjustmentSeverity of Illness IndexStatistics as TopicTimeTotal Quality ManagementUnited StatesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Alemi, D W Oliver. 2001. Tutorial on risk-adjusted P-charts.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11702466/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Escitalopram in the long-term treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients.

AIM: The primary aim was to investigate the long-term safety and tolerability of escitalopram (10 or 20 mg/day) treatment of elderly patients suffering from major depressive disorder. The secondary aim was to examine response to treatment, as measured by change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from study entry to each visit, using observed cases. METHOD: This extension trial included 225 patients who had completed an 8-week, double blind, placebo-controlled lead-in study, which was performed in outpatients in primary care and in specialist clinics. The intent-to-treat population comprised 223 patients. RESULTS: The overall withdrawal rate was 24%. The most common reason for withdrawal was adverse events (9%). The 5 most common adverse events were accidental injury, rhinitis, weight increase, arthralgia and coughing, with an incidence ranging from 8 to 13%. No new types of adverse events were reported in this extension study compared to the 8-week lead-in study. The mean weight increased from 69.7 kg at study entry to 70.3 kg at endpoint. The percentage of patients in remission (MADRS total score < or = 12) increased from 48% at study entry to 72% by week 52. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram demonstrated a favourable tolerability profile during 52 weeks of open-label treatment of elderly patients, with further improvement in depressive symptoms.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2007

MRI of rupture of the spring ligament complex with talo-cuboid impaction.

The spring ligament complex is essential for the stability of the longitudinal arch of the foot and includes the ligaments between the calcaneus and the talus at the superomedial to inferoplantar aspect of the foot. Tears of the spring ligament complex are most commonly degenerative in etiology and secondary to concomitant abnormality of the posterior tibial tendon. We report MRI findings in a 30-year-old man who presented with traumatic rupture of the spring ligament complex, seen following dislocation of the talonavicular joint. We also describe the previously unreported MRI features of talo-cuboid impaction secondary to disruption of the spring ligament complex.

Accidental Falls↗