Controlling binocular rivalry.

A W Freeman; V A Nguyen

doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00181-x

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11704233

Controlling binocular rivalry.

A W Freeman·V A Nguyen

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Binocular rivalry is the alternating perception that occurs when the two eyes are presented with incompatible stimuli. We have developed a new method for controlling binocular rivalry and measuring its progress. One eye views a static grating while the fellow eye views a grating that smoothly and cyclically varies between two orientations, one the same as the static grating and the other orthogonal. Contrast sensitivity was tested monocularly a number of times during the stimulus cycle. When the eye viewing the static grating was tested, sensitivity varied between maximum and minimum values as the conditioning stimulus varied from binocularly compatible to incompatible. The interocular suppression thus demonstrated was limited to the eye viewing the static grating; variations in the fellow eye's sensitivity were due to interocular masking alone.

Explore related subjects

Contrast Sensitivity Humans Normal Distribution Perceptual Masking Psychophysics Vision Disparity Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

A W Freeman, V A Nguyen. 2001. Controlling binocular rivalry.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00181-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Direct evidence that "speedlines" influence motion mechanisms.

Determining the direction of visual motion poses a serious problem for any visual system, given the inherent ambiguities. Geisler (1999) has suggested that motion streaks left in the wake of a moving target provide a rich source of potential information that could aid in resolving direction ambiguities. Here we provide strong experimental evidence that the human visual system does in fact exploit motion streaks in direction discrimination. Masks comprising oriented random noise impeded direction discrimination of moving dots when the masks were oriented parallel to the direction of motion but had very little effect when oriented orthogonal to the direction of motion. The masking effect decreased systematically with increasing bandwidth for the parallel masks and increased with bandwidth for the orthogonal masks. Importantly, these masks had little effect on neither contrast sensitivity for detecting the moving stimuli nor for speed discrimination. Experiments with "Glass patterns" (moiré patterns constructed from random dot pairs) confirmed that misleading pattern information can impede motion detection. The results show that the oriented streaks left by moving stimuli provide fundamental information about the direction of visual motion; removing these streaks or augmenting them with erroneous streaks severely confounds motion direction discrimination.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed2002

High temporal frequency synchrony is insufficient for perceptual grouping.

We used textures of randomly moving grating patches to assess the role of fine-grain temporal synchrony in texture segregation. In the target area, patches reversed direction simultaneously. In the surround, patches changed direction at random times. Thus, phase changes in the target area were precisely synchronous, whereas those in the surround were not. In agreement with work carried out by Lee and Blake, we found that the target area was frequently visible, and that observers could discriminate its shape (horizontal versus vertical) at frame rates of 100 Hz in brief exposures (200 ms). Further experiments suggested that the length of unidirectional motion sequences in the target area, rather than synchrony, determined its visibility. To eliminate completely contrast and motion cues, we made all the background elements identical to the target elements, but with a random starting phase. Despite the presence of synchrony in the target area but not the background, the target was generally very hard to see. Targets that remained visible contained low temporal frequency modulations of direction. We conclude that the human observer can detect synchrony, but only at modest temporal frequencies once motion and contrast artefacts have been eliminated.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed2002

Effect of spatial waveform on apparent spatial frequency.

We examined the effect of spatial waveform on the perceived spatial frequency of a grating target. The luminance profile of 0.5 c/ degrees sinusoidal gratings was modified by either compressive or expansive power functions, and was presented alternately with a true sinusoidal grating. Subjects matched the apparent spatial frequency of the two gratings using a method of adjustment. Both compressive and expansive power functions lowered the perceived spatial frequency of the grating, irrespective of the stimulus contrast. Rectified sine wave gratings were also found to reduce apparent spatial frequency. The magnitude of the spatial frequency shifts with spatial waveform diminished with successive matches, which may represent a change in matching strategy employed by observers. Calculations and a further experiment suggest that judgements of spatial frequency may in part be determined by the separation between edges in a grating.

Contrast Sensitivity↗