PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11713416

Sample size requirement for detecting interference under the chi-square model.

Abstract

The chi-square model (CHS) of recombination has been studied extensively, in recent years, for its ability of capturing the process and estimating the level of crossover interference. Exploration thus far shows that this model yields much better fits to human genetic data than Haldane's no-interference model, and the explicit level of interference can be easily estimated as well. This paper provides calculations of sample sizes required to detect interference under CHS for a variety of settings. Two data types, fully informative meioses and phase-unknown backcross families, are studied. Under each setting, we calculate the number of meioses/families needed to ensure that the expected log-likelihood difference between the chi(2) interference model and Haldane's no-interference model exceeds a prespecified threshold. It is found that joint consideration of multiple (more than three) markers dramatically reduces the number of meioses/families needed when compared to an analysis based on three-point data, a traditional setting for detecting interference using three-point tests. The results indicate that the numbers of meioses needed to detect interference under CHS are well within the reach of most genetic mapping studies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Lin. 2001. Sample size requirement for detecting interference under the chi-square model.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000053377

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Power calculations for a general class of family-based association tests: dichotomous traits.

Using large-sample theory, we present a unified approach to power calculations for family-based association tests. Currently available methods for power calculations are restricted to special designs or require approximations or simulations. Our analytical approach to power calculations is broadly applicable in many settings. We discuss power calculations for two scenarios that have high practical relevance and in which power previously could only be assessed by simulation studies or by approximations: (1) studies using both affected and unaffected offspring and (2) studies with missing parental information. When the population prevalence is high, it can be worthwhile to genotype unaffected offspring. For many scenarios, high power can be achieved with reasonable sample sizes, even when no parental information is available.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

The validity of drug use self-reports among hard core drug users in a household survey in Puerto Rico: comparison of survey responses of cocaine and heroin use with hair tests.

The extent to which underreporting of drug use in household surveys affects the validity of epidemiological studies of drug use disorders is largely unknown. We developed a list of known hard core drug users as part of a larger household study in Puerto Rico. The known drug users were recruited and interviewed with the same procedures used for the respondents selected through area-probability sampling. Upon completion of the interview, subjects were asked to provide a sample of scalp hair. A total of 78 hair specimens were collected from the known drug users. Hair specimens were screened for cocaine and heroin using radio immunoassay, and confirmed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Using the cutoff of 0.2 ng/mg of hair, 93.2% of the hair specimens were classified positive for cocaine and 75.7% for heroin. With the hair test results as the gold-standard, we calculated specificity and sensitivity statistics as measures of the validity of self-reports. Self-reports of drug use in the past 3 months had a specificity of 78% or higher for both drugs. The sensitivity of self-reports was 69.6% for reports of recent cocaine use and 78.6% for reports of recent heroin use. Sensitivity increased with reports of use in more remote time periods, among subjects reporting DSM-IV drug disorder symptoms, and among those reporting use of both drugs. The results suggest that while drug reports of hard core drug users interviewed in household surveys might be more valid than those of the general population, there still remains considerable under-reporting.

Chi-Square Distribution↗