PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11729443

Optimizing acid-suppression therapy.

Abstract

Acid-related disorders are caused by an imbalance between acid secretion by the gastric parietal cells and the defensive mechanisms of the gastrointestinal tract to protect against the effects of acid. Therapy for acid-related disorders focuses on the control of acidity. Data collected throughout the last decade have demonstrated that PPIs are the most effective therapy for acid-related disorders: PPIs have proven superior to H2RAs and antacids in numerous studies. Five PPIs are currently available in the United States. While all PPIs exert their effect through the same basic mechanism of action, they do not have the same pharmacologic and clinical properties. All PPIs are effective in healing and maintenance of gastric and duodenal ulcers and GERD. The PPIs differ, however, in their ability to control symptoms rapidly and consistently. Due to its more rapid rate of activation, rabeprazole results in a faster onset of action and faster symptom control than other PPIs. Studies comparing rabeprazole to omeprazole found statistically significant differences in the rapidity of symptom relief in patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and GERD. Rapid symptom relief is important to the majority of patients, as their symptoms have an impact on their quality of life. Rapid symptom relief is also important in an environment where patients self-medicate on demand, depending on daily symptoms. Rabeprazole has also been shown to have a more consistent suppression of acid, including at night. Optimizing therapy with PPIs necessitates consideration not only of healing rates of the different available treatments but also of the rapidity and consistency of acid suppression that translate clinically into symptom relief.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J L Barnett, M Robinson. 2001. Optimizing acid-suppression therapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11729443/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients: improving the cost of pharmacotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard 7-day triple therapy are unsatisfactory. A novel 10-day sequential treatment regimen recently achieved a significantly higher eradication rate. To improve the pharmacotherapeutic cost, we evaluated whether an acceptable eradication rate could be achieved in peptic ulcer patients by halving the dose of clarithromycin. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label study, 152 duodenal ulcer patients with H. pylori infection, assessed by rapid urease test and histology, were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either a 10-day sequential treatment comprising rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.d. for the first 5 days, followed by rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. for the remaining 5 days (high-dose therapy), or a similar schedule with the clarithromycin doses halved to 250 mg b.d. (low-dose therapy). No further antisecretory drugs were offered. Four to six weeks after therapy, H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing rates were assessed by endoscopy. RESULTS: Similar H. pylori eradication rates were observed following high- and low-dose regimens for both per protocol (97.3% vs. 95.9%; P = N.S.) and intention-to-treat (94.7% vs. 92.2%; P = N.S.) analyses. No major side-effects were reported. At repeat endoscopy, peptic ulcer healing was observed in 93% and 93% of patients following high- and low-dose therapy, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cheaper low-dose sequential regimen may be suggested for H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients, even without continued proton pump inhibitor therapy after eradication treatment.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

Helicobacter pylori eradication is beneficial in the treatment of functional dyspepsia.

AIM: To assess whether the eradication of Helicobacter pylori leads to long-term relief of symptoms in functional dyspepsia. METHODS: Eight hundred patients with functional dyspepsia were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with twice-daily 30 mg lansoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin for 7 days (L30AC), twice-daily 15 mg lansoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin for 7 days (L15AC), or once-daily 15 mg lansoprazole for 14 days (LP). Dyspepsia and reflux symptoms were monitored for 12 months. RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, the non-ulcer dyspepsia sum score showed a statistically significant benefit in terms of symptom relief in the L30AC group (P = 0.0068) compared with the LP group, but there was no significant difference between the L15AC and LP groups (P = 0.2). When all patients in the two eradication therapy arms were considered together, successful eradication had a significant benefit with regard to the complete absence of symptoms (P < 0.04). H. pylori eradication did not lead to an increase in reflux symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that H. pylori infection causes dyspeptic symptoms in a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia, and that these patients may obtain long-term symptomatic benefit following H. pylori eradication.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

Once-daily pantoprazole 40 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg have equivalent overall efficacy in relieving GERD-related symptoms.

AIM: To compare the efficacy of pantoprazole and esomeprazole for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease- (GERD-) related symptoms. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind study 217 patients [intention-to-treat (ITT) population] diagnosed with endoscopically proven GERD grade B/C received pantoprazole (40 mg once daily (o.d.), n = 112] or esomeprazole (40 mg o.d/, n = 105) for 4 weeks. Patients recorded GERD-related symptoms (daytime and night-time) using diaries (daily), and/or by telephone interviews (every third day) and completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. The area under the time curve (AUC) for the sum score of GERD-related symptoms (symptom load of each patient during the treatment) and the time to reach adequate relief from GERD-related symptoms were calculated. RESULTS: Patients reported first adequate relief from daytime GERD-related symptoms after a mean of 3.7 (pantoprazole) and 5.9 days (esomeprazole) (P = 0.034); the values for the night-time were 1.7 and 3.5 days, respectively (P = 0.012, ITT). The AUCs for the single symptoms and the sum scores were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pantoprazole resulted in significantly faster first-time relief from daytime and night-time GERD-related symptoms than esomeprazole. Pantoprazole and esomeprazole were similar with respect to reduction of load of GERD-related symptoms.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗