PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11749934

Central neurocircuitry associated with emesis.

Abstract

Ingestion of toxin, traumatic events, adverse drug reactions, and motion can all result in nausea and emesis. In addition, cyclic vomiting syndrome is quite prevalent in the pediatric population. Coordination of the various autonomic changes associated with emesis occurs at the level of the medulla oblongata of the hindbrain. Chemosensitive receptors detect emetic agents in the blood and relay this information by means of neurons in the area postrema to the adjacent nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). Abdominal vagal afferents that detect intestinal luminal contents and gastric tone also terminate in the NTS (gelatinosus, commissural, and medial subnuclei). The NTS is viscerotopically organized into subnuclei that subserve diverse functions related to swallowing (subnucleus centralis), gastric sensation (subnucleus gelatinosus), laryngeal and pharyngeal sensation (intermediate and interstitial NTS), baroreceptor function (medial NTS), and respiration (ventrolateral NTS). Neurons from the NTS project to a central pattern generator (CPG), which coordinates the sequence of behaviors during emesis, as well as directly to diverse populations of neurons in the ventral medulla and hypothalamus. Thus, it is critical to realize that there is not an isolated "vomiting center," but rather groups of loosely organized neurons throughout the medulla that may be activated in sequence by a CPG. The newer antiemetic agents appear to block receptors in the peripheral endings of vagal afferents to reduce "perception" of emetic stimuli and/or act in the dorsal vagal complex. A primary site of action of 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists is by means of the vagal afferents. Neurokinin-1 receptor (NK(1)R) antagonists are antiemetics, because they act at a site in the dorsal vagal complex. Part of their effectiveness may be the result of inhibition of the NK(1)R on vagal motor neurons to prevent fundic relaxation, which is a prodromal event essential for emesis. Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), the major psychoactive component of marijuana, can be therapeutically useful as an antiemetic. The site of action of Delta(9)-THC is on cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the dorsal vagal complex. However, it decreases fundic tone and antral motility. It is not easy to predict the potential antiemetic effects of drugs that alter motility. Although antiemetic drugs are available for management of acute chemotherapeutic-induced emesis, few treatments are effective for delayed emesis or cyclic vomiting syndrome.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P J Hornby. 2001-12-03. Central neurocircuitry associated with emesis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00849-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of four 5-HT3-receptor antagonists for acute chemotherapy-induced emesis.

GOALS OF WORK: Comparing antiemetic efficacy of different 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists (5-HT(3)RAs) is difficult due to inter-study variability. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to comparatively evaluate dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron and tropisetron for acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparisons between 5-HT(3)RAs were based on 44 randomized studies (including 12,343 patients) identified by MEDLINE, CANCERLIT or EMBASE searches and subcategorized by chemotherapy type (cisplatin- or non-cisplatin-based). MAIN RESULTS: When all studies were combined, granisetron was equivalent to ondansetron (n = 27), and showed an advantage vs tropisetron (p = 0.018; n = 12). Ondansetron vs tropisetron (n = 11) and ondansetron vs dolasetron (n = 3) revealed equivalence in each comparison. An advantage for 3 mg granisetron vs 8 mg ondansetron was found in non-cisplatin-based studies (p = 0.015; n = 6). Overall equivalence was seen between ondansetron, 24 or 32 mg, and granisetron, 2 or 3 mg, for all studies (n = 13). There was a possible advantage for higher (24 or 32 mg) vs lower (8 mg) ondansetron dose regimens with cisplatin-based trials (n = 6). No differences were seen between 3 and 1 mg granisetron doses (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of 5-HT(3)RAs for preventing CINV following cisplatin- and non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy is comparable, with the exception of granisetron vs tropisetron. Some differences were noted in dosing subanalyses.

Antiemetics↗

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adults. DATA SOURCES: Literature retrieval was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-December 2006) using the terms postoperative nausea and vomiting, prevention and treatment. Article references were hand-searched for additional relevant articles and abstracts. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All studies published in English were evaluated. Those dealing with prevention and treatment of PONV in adults were included in the review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence suggests that providing prophylactic antiemetic medications in high-risk surgical patients is warranted. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are widely used, with no one agent being clearly superior. However, studies have shown other types of agents to be more cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The first step in the prevention of PONV is assessment and reduction of risk factors. Although nonpharmacologic therapies may play a role in the treatment of PONV, the mainstay of therapy for PONV is pharmacologic modalities. Patients at moderate to high risk for PONV need prophylactic antiemetic therapy. High-risk patients may require combination therapy with 2 or 3 agents from different antiemetic classes. Rescue antiemetic therapy is needed by patients who actually develop PONV. The agents of choice in such cases should be from antiemetic classes different from those used for prophylaxis of PONV.

Antiemetics↗

Comparative activity of antiemetic drugs.

Nausea and vomiting continues to be an important problem for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are classified as acute, occurring within the first 24h, or delayed, occurring after the first 24h. A number of antiemetic agents are available for the management of nausea and vomiting, including 5-HT3-receptor-antagonists, corticosteroids, NK-1-receptor-antagonists, dopamine-receptor antagonists, benzodiazepines, neuroleptics and cannabinoids. With modern antiemetic therapy, vomiting can be prevented in 70-80% of patients, whereas the control of nausea remains suboptimal. The development of acute emesis is known to depend on serotonin. The pathophysiology of delayed emesis is less well understood, and multiple mechanisms may contribute, including substance P. Here, the most recent developments in the antiemetic therapy, including new antiemetic drugs and the latest guidelines for antiemetic prophylaxis, are reviewed.

Antiemetics↗