PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11757884

Technical competency in flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family practice residencies offer training in flexible sigmoidoscopy; however, there are no objective recommendations for determining competency in learners. We describe a longitudinal study designed to determine the mean procedure time and depth of insertion for family practice residents. METHODS: During a 21-month period, data were collected for 421 patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy. Second- or third-year family medicine residents supervised by family medicine faculty did all procedures. The data were analyzed with simple descriptive statistics, t test, and linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean procedure time was 18+/-9.3 minutes (17.2 - 19.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]). The mean insertion depth was 51.4+/-12.4 cm (50.4 - 52.6 cm, 95% CI). Performing a biopsy was associated with an increase in procedure time (17.0 vs 27.3 minutes, P < .0001). Women with a history of pelvic surgery had less depth of insertion than did those who had no history of pelvic surgery (47 vs 53 cm, P = .002, t test). CONCLUSION: Procedural competency consists of knowledge, technical skills, and attitudes. Knowledge and attitudes can be assessed with other items, such as examinations and observation. Primary care faculty can now use these standards of insertion depth and procedure time when determining technical skill proficiency for their residents in flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J R Holman, R C Marshall, B Jordan, L Vogelman. Technical competency in flexible sigmoidoscopy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11757884/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

"Only a GP?": is the solution to the general practice crisis intellectual?

General practice is suffering a crisis of status, as shown by financial, power and intellectual markers. This is serious as a strong general-practice workforce is important to deliver cost-effective, high-quality healthcare. We argue that strengthening the intellectual aspects of general practice (particularly critical thinking) is essential. Most strategies to achieve this centre on research, with many initiatives in Australia and overseas to enhance research by general practitioners; there is still insufficient clinical research in general practice. Other ways to improve critical thinking include promoting use of evidence-based medicine, provided it is not implemented only via "cook-book" guidelines. Other innovations are desperately needed.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

General practitioners' perceptions of the pharmaceutical decision-support tools in their prescribing software.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how Australian general practitioners use pharmaceutical decision-support (PDS) systems; to determine GPs' perceptions of the deficiencies and strengths of these systems; and how they believe they can be improved. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative analysis of discussion from three focus groups of GPs (from one rural and two urban Divisions of General Practice) between April and May 2002. PARTICIPANTS: 22 GPs selected to include users of the five most popular prescribing/clinical practice software products available in Australia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Advantages and disadvantages of using PDS software; ideas for improving PDS systems; attitudes to electronic evidence-based guidelines. RESULTS: GPs believed that important interactions may be missed because of desensitisation resulting from too many alerts (which also intrude on workflow); that interaction alerts need to be severity graded and only significant ones should appear; and that improved computer-user interface design could enhance the usefulness of PDS systems. CONCLUSIONS: Our results will provide useful feedback to government, software vendors and software developers on the needs and expectations of end users and on the development of agreed software standards.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗