Preoxygenation time versus decompression sickness incidence.

Abstract

Preoxygenation, breathing 100% oxygen prior to decompression, has been used for well over half of this century to reduce decompression sickness (DCS) incidence. Duration of preoxygenation has been reported to be inversely related to subsequent DCS incidence. A direct comparison of DCS incidence at 30,000 ft versus preoxygenation time is needed to allow better-informed decisions regarding the cost vs. benefit of increasing preoxygenation time to prevent DCS. To obtain such a comparison, we accomplished a retrospective study of exposures to 30,000 ft (226 mm Hg; 4.37 psia) while performing mild exercise. The 86 male exposures were preceded by preoxygenation times of one to four hours. Venous gas emboli (VGE) and DCS symptom development were monitored and recorded. Although more protection was demonstrated with increasing preoxygenation time, the cost-to-benefit ratio also increases with each additional increment of preoxygenation time. The diminishing return of increasing preoxygenation to reduce DCS would eventually impact mission planning and crew duty limitations. Alteration in the physiology of denitrogenation, such as inclusion of exercise during preoxygenation, may provide better and more cost-effective DCS protection than simply increasing preoxygenation time.