PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11763544

Nonparametric test for doubly interval-censored failure time data.

Abstract

This paper considers comparison of discrete failure time distributions when the survival time of interest measures elapsed time between two related events and observations on the occurrences of both events could be interval-censored. This kind of data is often referred to as doubly interval-censored failure time data. If the occurrence of the first event defining the survival time can be exactly observed, the data are usually referred to as interval-censored data. For the comparison problem based on interval-censored failure time data, Sun (1996) proposed a nonparametric test procedure. In this paper we generalize the procedure given in Sun (1996) to doubly interval-censored data case and the generalized test is evaluated by simulations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Sun. 2001. Nonparametric test for doubly interval-censored failure time data.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1012596731505

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prognostic factors associated with the clinical outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a cohort study in Japan.

One hundred and eighty-five Japanese women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were enrolled in this follow-up study. On the basis of the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in Japanese cervical cancer patients, HPV types were categorized into three groups as follows: (1) high risk (types 16, 18, 33, 52, and 58), (2) intermediate risk (types 31, 35, 39, 51, 56, 59, 68, and 70), (3) low risk (type 6, 30, 42, 53, 54, 55, 66 and unclassified types). High-risk HPV infection was a risk factor for progression of the disease. The regression rate in the HPV negative group was higher (83.3%) than those in the HPV positive groups, but the differences in regression were no longer significant after adjustment for age and CIN grade. It is also noted that a lower cytomegalovirus IgG level and a smaller number of past pregnancies might be associated with the regression of CIN lesions.

Cohort Studies↗

Electronically screening discharge summaries for adverse medical events.

OBJECTIVE: Detecting adverse events is pivotal for measuring and improving medical safety, yet current techniques discourage routine screening. The authors hypothesized that discharge summaries would include information on adverse events, and they developed and evaluated an electronic method for screening medical discharge summaries for adverse events. DESIGN: A cohort study including 424 randomly selected admissions to the medical services of an academic medical center was conducted between January and July 2000. The authors developed a computerized screening tool that searched free-text discharge summaries for trigger words representing possible adverse events. MEASUREMENTS: All discharge summaries with a trigger word present underwent chart review by two independent physician reviewers. The presence of adverse events was assessed using structured implicit judgment. A random sample of discharge summaries without trigger words also was reviewed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent (251 of 424) of the discharge summaries contained trigger words. Based on discharge summary review, 44.8% (327 of 730) of the alerted trigger words indicated a possible adverse event. After medical record review, the tool detected 131 adverse events. The sensitivity and specificity of the screening tool were 69% and 48%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the tool was 52%. CONCLUSION: Medical discharge summaries contain information regarding adverse events. Electronic screening of discharge summaries for adverse events using keyword searches is feasible but thus far has poor specificity. Nonetheless, computerized clinical narrative screening methods could potentially offer researchers and quality managers a means to routinely detect adverse events.

Cohort Studies↗