PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11764526

[Size as a parameter for tuning visual attention].

Abstract

The ability of visual attention to tune to the stimulus size (when this size could not be described by spatial frequencies) was studies. Sinusoidal gratings with frequencies of 1.5, 3, and 6 cycle/degree were used as test stimuli. All these stimuli consisted of 3 periods, consequently, they had different sizes: 2 x 2, 1 x 1, and 0.5 x 0.5 degrees. Three reference stimuli had the same sizes but were constructed as a superposition of all the test frequencies. The reference stimulus of suprathreshold contrast was displayed for 400 ms to the left or to the right of a fixation point at a distance of 3 degrees. After that, the test stimulus of threshold contrast was for 100 ms displayed symmetrically to the fixation point on the other side. Subjects were instructed that the sizes of the reference and test stimuli were the same. It was found that the probability of test detection decreased with increase in the difference between the sizes of the reference and test stimuli. Since in our experiments the spatial frequency could not be used for tuning visual attention, the obtained results suggest that there are specialized mechanisms in the visual system for estimation of the general image size.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V V Babenko, G A Kuraev, S N Kul'ba. [Size as a parameter for tuning visual attention].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11764526/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗