[Clinico-pathologic differences between bladder neoplasm with low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma].

J Alvarez Kindelán; A López Beltrán; F Anglada Curado; P Moreno Arcas; J L Carazo Carazo; J C Regueiro López; M Leva Vallejo; R Prieto Castro; M J Requena Tapia

doi:10.1016/s0210-4806(01)72690-3

PubMed · 11765548

[Clinico-pathologic differences between bladder neoplasm with low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma].

J Alvarez Kindelán·A López Beltrán·F Anglada Curado·P Moreno Arcas·J L Carazo Carazo·J C Regueiro López·M Leva Vallejo·R Prieto Castro·M J Requena Tapia

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the morphologic subgrouping of grade I bladder tumors between papillary neoplasm of low malignant potential and low grade papillary carcinoma is of clinical and survival value. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 257 consecutive patients diagnosed of superficial bladder cancer between 1990 and 1995 in HU Reina Sofia of Cordoba were reviewed and further reclassified according to WHO/ISUP consensus classification of urothelial neoplasms of the bladder. Of the tumors 12 were urothelial papilloma, 51 were papillary neoplasm of low malignant potential, 43 were low grade papillary carcinoma Ta, 65 were low grade papillary carcinoma T1 and 37 were high grade papillary carcinoma. Eleven patients were reevaluated as T2 tumors and 38 (14.8%) were lost of control. All patients were reviewed with a follow-up at least of 5 years. We compare the results between groups with Fisher test and the risk factors for recurrence and progression are analyzed by multivariate analysis (Odds ratio). The survival function was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: There are no differences between groups respect the age or sex distribution. The differences in the multiplicity are not significant and only the mean size is higher in papillary low grade carcinoma. About the risk factors for recurrence and progression of the disease, only is significative the tumor size. Rarely, the use of chemotherapy seems to play a role in the recurrence. There are no differences in recurrence and progression between the groups, although the percentages are always higher in the papillary low grade carcinoma group. CONCLUSIONS: There are enough clinical differences between the two groups and we consider them as distinct pathologic entities. Only the higher tumoral size is prognostic factor in each group. We think that the use of chemotherapy must be avoided in this low grade bladder tumors.

Explore related subjects

Carcinoma Female Humans Male Middle Aged Urinary Bladder Neoplasms Comparative Study English Abstract Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J Alvarez Kindelán, A López Beltrán, F Anglada Curado, P Moreno Arcas, J L Carazo Carazo, J C Regueiro López, M Leva Vallejo, R Prieto Castro, M J Requena Tapia. 2001. [Clinico-pathologic differences between bladder neoplasm with low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0210-4806(01)72690-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Gastric amphicrine carcinoma in the stomach: an unexpected presentation of MUTYH-associated polyposis.

Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.

Carcinoma↗

PubMed2007

Perioperative outcomes of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for non-appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis from a prospective database.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has expanded its application in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal and ovarian malignancies. An accurate assessment of perioperative outcomes is crucial for integration of this combined procedure into clinical practice. METHODS: A prospective study of 80 patients undergoing the combined treatment for non-appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis was conducted. Forty-seven adverse events by eight organ-systems were rated from Grade I to IV with increasing severity. RESULTS: One patient (1.3%) died postoperatively. Postoperative adverse events affected genitourinary system (38%), hematological system (31%), gastrointestinal system (25%), infection (20%), intravenous catheters status (15%), pulmonary system (14%), cardiovascular system (11%) and neurological system (4%). Thirty-six patients (45%) experienced 49 Grade III adverse events. Six patients (8%) experienced eight Grade IV adverse events. More than four peritonectomy procedures (P = 0.010), and length of hospital stay of more than 21 days (P = 0.007) were strongly associated with Grade III and/or Grade IV morbidity. CONCLUSION: The morbidity and mortality rates after the combined treatment for non-appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis were within the acceptable range of surgical treatments for other gastrointestinal cancers. A standardized prospective database is required for an accurate assessment of perioperative outcomes.

Carcinoma↗

PubMed2007

Parity, tubal sterilization, hysterectomy and risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma in Finland, 1975-2004.

We studied the possible relationship among parity, female sterilization, hysterectomy and the risk of primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) in a case-control study in Finland in cases occurring between 1975 and 2004. A total of 573 PFTC cases were identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and 10 age-matched controls per case were randomly selected from the Finnish Central Population Registry. In multivariate analysis (including 189 PFTC cases and 1764 controls) parity was protective: the odds ratio (OR) for 1-2 deliveries was 0.63 (95% CI 0.44-0.91) and for > or =3 deliveries, 0.32 (95% CI 0.19-0.52). The OR for sterilization was 0.74 (95% CI 0.42-1.30) and for hysterectomy 1.27 (95% CI 0.73-2.21). Our findings suggest a possible hormonal background as regards the development of PFTC.

Carcinoma↗