PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11784752

Temporal modulation transfer functions in cat primary auditory cortex: separating stimulus effects from neural mechanisms.

Abstract

We present here a comparison between the local field potentials (LFP) and multiunit (MU) responses, comprising 401 single units, in primary auditory cortex (AI) of 31 cats to periodic click trains, gamma-tone and time-reversed gamma-tone trains, AM noise, AM tones, and frequency-modulated (FM) tones. In a large number of cases, the response to all six stimuli was obtained for the same neurons. We investigate whether cortical neurons are likely to respond to all types of repetitive transients and modulated stimuli and whether a dependence on modulating waveform, or tone or noise carrier, exists. In 97% of the recordings, a temporal modulation transfer function (tMTF) for MU activity was obtained for gamma-tone trains, in 92% for periodic click trains, in 83% for time-reversed gamma-tone trains, in 82% for AM noise, in 71% for FM tones, and only in 53% for AM tones. In 31% of the cases, the units responded to all six stimuli in an envelope-following way. These particular units had significantly larger onset responses to each stimulus compared with all other units. The overall response distribution shows the preference of AI units for stimuli with short rise times such as clicks and gamma tones. It also shows a clear asymmetry in the ability to respond to AM noise and AM tones and points to a strong effect of the frequency content of the carrier on the subcortical processing of AM stimuli. Yet all temporal response properties were independent of characteristic frequency and frequency-tuning curve bandwidth. We show that the observed differences in the tMTFs for different stimuli are to a large extent produced by the different degree of phase locking of the neuronal firings to the envelope of the first stimulus in the train or first modulation period. A normalization procedure, based on these synchronization differences, unified the tMTFs for all stimuli except clicks and allowed the identification of a largely stimulus-invariant, low-pass temporal filter function that most likely reflects the properties of synaptic depression and facilitation. For nonclick stimuli, the low-pass filter has a cutoff frequency of approximately 10 Hz and a slope of approximately 6 dB/octave. For nonclick stimuli, there was a systematic difference between the vector strength for LFPs and MU activity that can likely be attributed to postactivation suppression mechanisms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jos J Eggermont. 2002. Temporal modulation transfer functions in cat primary auditory cortex: separating stimulus effects from neural mechanisms.. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00490.2001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The midlatency auditory evoked potential P50 is abnormal in Huntington's disease.

The P50 (or P1) potential is a midlatency auditory evoked response, believed to be partially generated by the cholinergic pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) neurons that give rise to the ascending reticular activating system (RAS). We compared the P50 potential in 11 Huntington's disease (HD) patients and 13 normal controls using a paired click stimulus paradigm. HD patients exhibited a P50 potential with reduced amplitude and increased latency to the first stimulus of the pair (first P50 potential), suggesting impaired ascending reticular activating system function, which may contribute to sleep disorders seen in HD. Sensory gating, measured as the percent ratio of the second P50 potential amplitude to the first P50 potential amplitude, was reduced at 250 and 500 ms interstimulus intervals (ISI), which may be related to disordered attention and anxiety in HD.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Posttraining lesion of the superior colliculus interferes with feature-negative discrimination of fear-potentiated startle.

Though much is known about the neural circuits involved in the elicitation of fear, little is known about the neural circuits responsible for the reduction of fear. The present experiments investigated the contribution of the superior colliculus (SC) and the dorsal periacquaductal gray (dPAG) in the reduction of conditioned fear produced by an auditory feature trained in a feature-negative discrimination procedure. In this procedure, light plus foot shock training trials are interspersed with trials in which the light is preceded by a noise and this noise and light compound is not followed by foot shock. At the end of this feature-negative discrimination training, rats were given excitotoxic lesions of the SC or dPAG. Feature-negative discrimination of fear was assessed with the fear-potentiated startle effect in which conditioned fear is operationally defined as potentiated startle amplitude in the presence versus the absence of the light. Feature-negative discrimination of fear is evidenced by a reduction in fear-potentiated startle to the light when the noise feature accompanies the light. Lesions of the SC, but not the dPAG, interfered with feature-negative discrimination of fear-potentiated startle suggesting that the SC plays a role in feature-negative discrimination of fear. Both SC and dPAG lesions facilitated startle amplitude in the absence of the light suggesting that these structures may exert a tonic inhibition on the acoustic startle reflex. The SC receives polymodal sensory information and is known to project forebrain areas involved in the production of conditioned fear. Thus, the SC may be an important component of the feature-negative discrimination circuit.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Central vestibular system: vestibular nuclei and posterior cerebellum.

The vestibular nuclei and posterior cerebellum are the destination of vestibular primary afferents and the subject of this review. The vestibular nuclei include four major nuclei (medial, descending, superior and lateral). In addition, smaller vestibular nuclei include: Y-group, parasolitary nucleus, and nucleus intercalatus. Each of the major nuclei can be subdivided further based primarily on cytological and immunohistochemical histological criteria or differences in afferent and/or efferent projections. The primary afferent projections of vestibular end organs are distributed to several ipsilateral vestibular nuclei. Vestibular nuclei communicate bilaterally through a commissural system that is predominantly inhibitory. Secondary vestibular neurons also receive convergent sensory information from optokinetic circuitry, central visual system and neck proprioceptive systems. Secondary vestibular neurons cannot distinguish between sources of afferent activity. However, the discharge of secondary vestibular neurons can distinguish between "active" and "passive" movements. The posterior cerebellum has extensive afferent and efferent connections with vestibular nuclei. Vestibular primary afferents are distributed to the ipsilateral uvula-nodulus as mossy fibers. Vestibular secondary afferents are distributed bilaterally. Climbing fibers to the cerebellum originate from two subnuclei of the contralateral inferior olive; the dorsomedial cell column and beta-nucleus. Vestibular climbing fibers carry information only from the vertical semicircular canals and otoliths. They establish a coordinate map, arrayed in sagittal zones on the surface of the uvula-nodulus. Purkinje cells respond to vestibular stimulation with antiphasic modulation of climbing fiber responses (CFRs) and simple spikes (SSs). The modulation of SSs is out of phase with the modulation of vestibular primary afferents. Modulation of SSs persists, even after vestibular primary afferents are destroyed by a unilateral labyrinthectomy, suggesting that an interneuronal network, triggered by CFRs is responsible for SS modulation. The vestibulo-cerebellum, imposes a vestibular coordinate system on postural responses and permits adaptive guidance of movement.

Acoustic Stimulation↗