PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11792285

[Simulators in anesthesiology].

Abstract

The work of an anesthesiologist and that of a flight pilot share certain attributes. As pilots use simulators to obtain risk-free practice in recognizing and controlling situations that might lead to disaster, simulation programs are now emerging as a new way to learn and train anesthesiology is being conceived as a new task that integrates scientific knowledge and human factors. Simulators have been introduced into teaching and training programs as a powerful tools that allow anesthesiologists to learn, practice and train in a multitude of situations without putting human life at risk. Experience is limited so far, but acceptance has been high and simulators seem to accelerate the acquisition of skills and knowledge, although their effect on performance in critical situations has not been proven yet. Two types have been applied in anesthesiology: computer screen and mannequin. The usefulness of simulators ranges from training for situations that require the systematic application of protocols and the understanding of new drugs being introduced into clinical practice to the practice of how to use resources for managing anesthetic emergencies. It is still too early to use simulators for certifying and evaluating clinical performance, as further studies are needed to identify the type of events that reflect typical situations and to determine which procedures should be evaluated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Del Moral, J M Rabanal, C Díaz De Terán. 2001. [Simulators in anesthesiology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11792285/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗