PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11810795

[General practice adrift. Explosion of knowledge, technological development and population].

Abstract

The explosion of biomedical research, and in turn, the far-reaching specialisation, which accompanies it, makes the health service field increasingly obscure and confusing. The general practitioner as gatekeeper occupies a central and much needed role in health care. Inherent this role are the professional core qualities of continuity, entirety, and a personal doctor-patient relationship, which ideally allow the GP to sort out and co-ordinate available services so that they suit the individual patient. These GP qualities also have the merit of making patients more content, they contribute to shared decision making, and they limit costs through more co-ordinated services. General practice today is faced with a dilemma. Increasing specialisation, consumerism, and liberalizsation threaten to eliminate the generalist role in health care, precisely at a time when it is most acutely needed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N S Bojlén, D E Gannik. 2001-12-31. [General practice adrift. Explosion of knowledge, technological development and population].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11810795/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗