PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11811301

Population variation in migraine prevalence--the unsolved problem.

Abstract

Migraine is one of the most prevalent types of headache, which imposes a substantial burden on society as measured by direct and indirect costs. In the present work we review the obstacles to carrying out migraine epidemiological studies. Knowledge of the epidemiology of migraine has expanded because of the recent proliferation of large scale population-based studies using standardized case definitions. Previous surveys of the prevalence of migraine have given widely differing results. Even in population-based studies, there have been wide variations in estimates of migraine prevalence. The development of International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine has facilitated international comparisons in epidemiologic studies by providing explicit and consistent diagnostic criteria, Recent studies using IHS diagnostic criteria have given relatively consistent estimates of migraine prevalence (about 15-18% of women and 6% of men). Studies of racial diversity in the prevalence of migraine and other headaches are still not conclusive. Further work is needed on epidemiology of migraine and collaboration between epidemiologists and clinicians seems the most likely way to advance understanding in this field.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Lusić. 2001. Population variation in migraine prevalence--the unsolved problem.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11811301/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Psychiatric disorder criteria and their application to research in different racial groups.

BACKGROUND: The advent of standardized classification and assessment of psychiatric disorders, and considerable joint efforts among many countries has led to the reporting of international rates of psychiatric disorders, and inevitably, their comparison between different racial groups. RESULTS: In neurologic diseases with defined genetic etiologies, the same genetic cause has different phenotypes in different racial groups. CONCLUSION: We suggest that genetic differences between races mean that diagnostic criteria refined in one racial group, may not be directly and simply applicable to other racial groups and thus more effort needs to be expended on defining diseases in other groups. Cross-racial confounds (in addition to cultural confounds) make the interpretation of rates in different groups even more hazardous than seems to have been appreciated.

Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic↗