PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11817154

[Epilepsy. Classification and genetics].

Abstract

A common symptom of epilepsies are recurrent unprovoked epileptic seizures. These can be classified as focal or generalised. Thus, we can speak of focal or generalised epilepsies. Considering the rest of the medical history and the results of EEG and brain imaging the terms idiopathic, symptomatic and cryptogenic (i.e. probably symptomatic) are used to further characterise an epilepsy in a single patient. These classification scheme which is used since the end of the eighties allows decision making in therapy and an estimation of prognosis. Due to progress in epileptology during the last decade a more sophisticated approach is required. Thus, semiology of the single seizure becomes more important. The evolution of signs and symptoms during a seizure tells us something about the seizure onset zone and the mode of seizure propagation. The knowledge of them is a prerequisite for surgical treatment. Furthermore, semiology of seizures should determine social implications of epilepsy by far more than the fact that they are epileptic. Beside seizure semiology we have to consider the underlying neuropathological condition since it determines treatment and prognosis. Epilepsy is a consequence of acquired or genetic brain diseases. In case of the latter it becomes more and more possible to characterise and diagnose the genetic syndromes and to understand their pathophysiology. In epileptology the exact knowledge of an underlying genetic disease is not only of scientific interest. Beside being a condition sine qua non for adequate genetic counselling it influences the choice of anti-epileptic drugs and determines whether surgical treatment is indicated. Thus genetics are an important part of comprehensive care in epilepsy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Dorn. 2001. [Epilepsy. Classification and genetics].. https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930.58.11.629

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Emergent EEG: indications and diagnostic yield.

The authors reviewed the reports of all emergent EEG (EmEEG) performed in our hospital within 1 hour of the test being ordered over a period of 52 months. Two hundred sixty-one EmEEG (12.8% of all EEG) were performed. The most common reason to order the test was a change in mental status or coma (17.6%). Although EmEEG was ordered to rule out status epilepticus (SE) in 60.2% of cases, this diagnosis was made in only 10.7% of patients. The only independent predictor for SE was a history of cardiac or respiratory arrest (odds [95% CI], 6.8 [2.7 to 16.9]).

Electroencephalography↗

Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals.

In this study an information-theoretic test for general Granger causality is used to identify couplings and information transport between different brain areas during epileptic activities. This method can distinguish information that is actually exchanged between two systems from that due to the response to a common signal or past history. This is achieved by an appropriate conditioning of probabilities. Statistical assessment of causality is made from a nonparametric bootstrap test, whereas nonlinearity is assessed by a comparison with a linearized version of the causality index. The framework proposed here provides a useful and model free test to characterize interactions in intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) signals.

Electroencephalography↗

Interpretation of scaling properties of electroencephalographic fluctuations via spectral analysis and underlying physiology.

Detrended fluctuation analysis has recently demonstrated the existence of two approximate temporal scaling regimes in locally detrended human electroencephalographic (EEG) fluctuations, and has suggested a connection between the location of the breakpoint between regimes and the alpha resonance near 10 Hz. It is shown here that these scalings can be explained in terms of the filtering of the underlying power spectrum implied by the detrending process. Using a recent physiologically based model of EEG generation, the main features of the scalings, and deviations from them, are related to the underlying physiology of dendritic propagation and muscle electrical activity, and it is concluded that the effects of such physiological features are usually clearer in spectra.

Electroencephalography↗