PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11819945

Current practice in endodontics: 5. Obturation.

P V Carrotte
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The aim of this series of six articles is to improve the quality of endodontic treatment in general dental practice by considering what is currently being taught in dental schools. This article first considers the possible reasons for persisting symptoms following preparation of the root canals. It then reviews the many and varied methods of obturating the prepared root canal system that are available to the general dental practitioner. By considering the objectives of their treatment, and their own level of expertise, readers may decide that one or more new techniques may benefit their practice.

Explore related subjects

Dental LeakageDental Occlusion, TraumaticGutta-PerchaHumansPostoperative PainPeriapical AbscessRoot Canal ObturationRoot Canal PreparationToothacheJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P V Carrotte. Current practice in endodontics: 5. Obturation.. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2001.28.1.20

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Enterococcus faecalis type strain leakage through root canals filled with Gutta-Percha/AH plus or Resilon/Epiphany.

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare leakage of Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 through root canals of single-rooted extracted human mandibular premolars filled with either gutta-percha/AH Plus or Resilon/Epiphany using the continuous wave of condensation technique. Test and control teeth were suspended in an experimental bacterial leakage setup for 50 days. Kaplan-Meyer curves showed a tendency of the gutta-percha/AH Plus root fillings to prevent leakage better than Resilon/Epiphany counterparts. This tendency, however, was not statistically significant (log-rank test, p = 0.141). The estimated mean time for turbidity to occur in the broth below the suspended root was 35 days (SD = 5 days) in the gutta-percha/AH Plus and 33 days (SD = 4 days) in the Resilon/Epiphany group. It was concluded that within the limitations of this study, there was no apparent advantage of using Resilon/Epiphany over gutta-percha/AH Plus.

Dental Leakage↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of microleakage of roots filled with different techniques with a computerized fluid filtration technique.

The aim of this study was to compare the apical leakage of roots filled with different materials using a computerized fluid filtration technique. There were 36 freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors selected. After preparation and irrigation, 3 experimental groups of 10 roots were constituted. Ten roots were filled with AH Plus and gutta-percha, 10 roots were filled with Sealapex and gutta-percha, and 10 roots were filled with Epiphany sealer and Resilon cone using a single cone technique. Three roots were used as a positive control and three roots were used as a negative control group. Evaluation of the apical leakages was performed with a computerized fluid filtration technique. According to the results, the difference between group 3 and 1 and group 3 and 2 was statistically significant (p<0.05). Although group 2 leaked the most, there was no significant difference between group 1 and 2.

Dental Leakage↗
PubMed2006

Leakage and sealer penetration in smear-free dentin after a final rinse with 95% ethanol.

Forty extracted maxillary incisors were decoronated, prepared in a crown-down fashion and randomly divided into two groups of 16 roots each. Remaining roots served as controls. Smear layer was removed with 17% EDTA followed by 5.25% NaOCl, the canals in group N were again rinsed with NaOCl before obturation with laterally compacted gutta-percha and Roth's 801 sealer. The roots in group E were rinsed with 95% ethyl alcohol instead of NaOCl for the final rinse. Leakage was determined using a fluid-flow model. Roots were cleared, split, and sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules was measured under light-microscopy. Group E demonstrated significantly greater sealer penetration (p = 0.002) and significantly less leakage (p = 0.040), than group N. Leakage could not be significantly correlated with sealer penetration (p = 0.725). Under the conditions of this study, we found that a final rinse with 95% ethyl alcohol increased sealer penetration and decreased leakage.

Dental Leakage↗