PubMed · 11820247
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
2002. Cardiac resynchronization therapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11820247/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The last decade has seen a dramatic increase in the understanding of the molecular basis of arrhythmias. Much of this new information has been driven by genetic studies that focused on rare, monogenic arrhythmia syndromes that were accompanied or followed by cellular electrophysiological or biochemical studies. The marked clinical heterogeneity known from these familial arrhythmia syndromes has led to the development of a multifactorial ("multi-hit") concept of arrhythmogenesis in which causal gene mutations have a major effect on disease expression that is further modified by other factors such as age, gender, sympathetic tone, and environmental triggers. Systematic genetic studies have unraveled an unexpected DNA sequence variance in these arrhythmia genes that has ethnic-specific patterns. Whether this genetic variance may contribute as a second genetic modifier for arrhythmia development is under current investigation. The aim of this article is to review common genetic variation in ion channel genes and to compare these recent findings.
BACKGROUND: Plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1) increase after coronary angioplasty (PTCA) due to endothelial injury during the procedure. ET-1 has been found in human endocardial and myocardial cells. It is not known whether ET-1 increases after thermal injury induced by radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA). METHODS: We determined plasma ET-1 levels at baseline, immediately after, and at 2 and 6 h post-procedure in 31 patients undergoing PTCA and 16 patients undergoing RFA. Patients subjected to diagnostic coronary angiography (n=15) or electrophysiology study (n=13) served as controls. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, ET-1 levels increased significantly immediately post-PTCA (55.1+/-20.1 vs. 42.7+/-14.9 pg/ml, p<0.01) and at 2 h post-RFA (98.0+/-11.7 vs. 53.0+/-17.4 pg/ml, p<0.01) and returned to baseline measurements at 2 h post-PTCA and 6 h post-RFA. There was no change of ET-1 levels in the control groups. ET-1 kinetics curve was significantly higher post-RFA compared to post-PTCA (p<0.001). ET-1 immediately post-PTCA correlated with total pressure-time product applied for balloon inflation during the procedure (r=0.56, p<0.01). There was no correlation between ET-1 levels and the number of RFA applications. No patient developed ischemia post-PTCA. There were no complications or arrhythmia recurrences post-RFA. CONCLUSION: Endocardial thermal injury incurred during RFA is another mechanism of endothelin increase apart from mechanical injury of the coronary endothelium during PTCA and represents further evidence for the existence of the peptide in human endocardial endothelial and myocardial cells. ET-1 increase is delayed and more pronounced post-RFA compared to post-PTCA. Despite that, it does not seem to have any clinical impact in the immediate post-RFA period.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.