PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11827777

Lagging behind.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Barry S Kendler, Michael J Glade. 2002. Lagging behind.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00734-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Correcting for selection using frailty models.

Chronic diseases are roughly speaking lifelong transitions between the states: relapse and recovery. The long-term pattern of recurrent times-to-relapse can be investigated with routine register data on hospital admissions. The relapses become readmissions to hospital, and the time spent in hospital are gaps between subsequent times-at-risk. However, problems of selection and dependent censoring arise because the calendar period of observation is limited and the study population likely to be heterogeneous. We will theoretically verify that an assumption of conditional independence of all times-at-risk and gaps, given the latent individual frailty level, allows for consistent inference in the shared frailty model. Using simulation studies, we also investigate cases where gaps (and/or staggered entry) are informative for the individual frailty. We found that the use of the shared frailty model can be extended to situations, where gaps are dependent on the frailty, but short compared to the distribution of the times-to-relapse. Our motivating example deals with the course of schizophrenia. We analysed routine register data on readmissions in almost 9000 persons with the disorder. Marginal survival curves of time-to-first-readmission, time-to-second-readmission, etc. were estimated in the shared frailty model. Based on the schizophrenia literature, the conclusion of our analysis was rather surprising: one of a stable course of disorder.

Chronic Disease↗

What does the WHOQOL-Bref measure? Measurement overlap between quality of life and depressive symptomatology in chronic somatoform pain disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Quality of life has become an important outcome criterion for psychiatric interventions. Especially in chronic disorders with no complete recovery, the improvement of quality of life is an important treatment goal. Nevertheless, there are methodological problems in assessing quality of life. There is a possible measurement overlap between quality of life and psychopathology, especially depression, which may invalidate research results. This study addresses the quality of life of patients with chronic somatoform pain and its relation to depressive symptoms. METHOD: One hundred out-patients with somatoform pain disorder at the Behavioural Medicine Pain Clinic in the Department of Psychiatry of the Medical University of Vienna were diagnosed using the SCID for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM-IV). The patients filled out the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Pain intensity (average pain, maximum pain, minimal pain) and disability (work, leisure and family life) were assessed using visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Quality of life in somatoform pain disorder was reduced compared to the norm population, especially in the physical and psychological domains. There were highly significant negative correlations between, on the one hand, depressive symptomatology (BDI) and, on the other hand, the physical quality of life domain (r=-0.655, p<0.01), the psychological domain (r=-0.735, p<0.01), the social domain (r=-0.511, p<0.01) and the environmental domain (r=-0.561, p<0.01). In all domains of the WHOQOL-Bref and in the global score, significant differences between the group of patients with severe or very severe depressive symptoms and the group with no or only mild depressive symptoms were found. DISCUSSION: While the WHOQOL-Bref showed a poor quality of life of patients with chronic somatoform pain disorder in general and especially in the physical and in the psychological domains, the high correlation of physical and psychological quality of life scores with depressive symptomatology points to a measurement overlap. It is suggested that assessment of subjective quality of life should always be checked for the influence of depressive symptomatology on the quality of life score.

Chronic Disease↗

Context moderates illness-induced lifestyle disruptions across life domains: a test of the illness intrusiveness theoretical framework in six common cancers.

The illness intrusiveness theoretical framework maintains that illness-induced lifestyle disruptions compromise quality of life in chronic life-threatening conditions and that this effect is moderated by social, psychological, and contextual factors. Considerable evidence indicates that lifestyle disruptions compromise quality of life in cancer and other diseases and that the effects differ across life domains. The hypothesis that contextual factors (e.g. age, education, income, stressful life events) moderate these effects has not been tested extensively. We investigated whether age, income, education, and/or recent stressful life events modify the experience of illness intrusiveness across three central life domains (Relationships and Personal Development, Intimacy, and Instrumental life) in six common cancers. A sample of 656 cancer outpatients with one of six common cancers (breast, prostate, lymphoma, lung, head and neck, and gastrointestinal, all n's>100) completed the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale while awaiting follow-up appointments with an oncologist. Results indicated statistically significant (all p's<0.05) interactions involving each of the hypothesized moderator variables and the Life Domain factor. In each case, greatest divergence was evident when illness intrusiveness involved instrumental life domains (e.g. work, finances, health, and active recreation). The findings substantiate the illness intrusiveness theoretical framework and support its relevance for people with cancer. The psychosocial impact of chronic life-threatening disease differs across life domains and depends on the context in which it is experienced.

Chronic Disease↗