PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11840725

Guidelines for guidelines.

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are suited tools for controlling and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of medical care. With the upcoming internet, the numbers of CPGs have increased rapidly, however, only few offer the attributes of good guidelines such as reliability/reproducibility, applicability, flexibility, clarity, multidisciplinary process, scheduled review and documentation of clinical and scientific evidence. Nearly identical criteria for appraisal of CPGs have been developed in many countries consisting of a checklist with questions concerning the quality of development, the content and format, and the applicability of the guideline. In the United States, guidelines which successfully passed the appraisal (or clearing) process, were stored in the National Guideline Clearinghouse, an internet-based database. A German counterpart is under construction, which will comprise clearing reports reviewing and appraising all existent guidelines covering a medical topic. Developing high-quality CPGs is a time consuming and expensive process. A widely accepted guideline for guideline development was published by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. CPGs touching neurosurgical topics are rare and often developed without neurosurgical participation. Due to the potential medico-economic impact of CPGs in the future, national neurosurgical societies and their international associations should play a more active role in the development and implementation of CPGs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W I Steudel, K Schwerdtfeger. 2001. Guidelines for guidelines.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6237-8_41

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Evidence based nursing: principles and applicability].

The work considers the evidence based nursing as a new operational model that integrates individual clinical competencies, through clinical finding generated by scientific research and analyzes the inclusion of this practice to the actual nursing professional model.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

Radical surgery for mesothelioma: how can we obtain evidence?

Asbestos exposure in industry and construction sites in the 1960s and 1970s has left a legacy of mesothelioma, a diffuse pleural cancer, with a lag time of 40 to 50 years and due to peak around 2015 to 2020. Some surgeons believe that by radical surgery they can prolong life and relieve symptoms, but the evidence comes from very carefully selected series. How do surgeons respond to demand for evidence of benefit? In this article we explore how evidence for major surgical operations has been gained and how mesothelioma fits into this history.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗