PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11854849

Eicosenoids Modify Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis.

Abstract

Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the brain and spinal cord. It is an animal model of postinfectious encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis (MS). In EAE and in MS, monocytes and Th1 lymphocytes penetrate the blood-brain barrier, and the ensuing inflammation causes demyelination and death of oligodendroglia. PGE is a product of blood Mo and of brain glial cells that affects immune regulation. PGE and other cAMP agonists inhibit monocyte function and secretion of cytokines by Th1 cells. However, they have minimal effects on some cytokines secreted by Th2 cells. We hypothesized that eicosenoids would inhibit central nervous system inflammation mediated by Th1 cells. We found that misoprostol, a long-acting PGE1 analog, inhibited clinical and histological signs of moderately severe EAE in Lewis rats. Indomethacin also suppressed EAE and enhanced the LAPGE effect. Both agents suppressed EAE when administered either from the time of immunization or from the onset of clinical disease. The combination of misoprostol and indomethacin inhibited delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to MBP (a Th1 response). These agents also inhibited in vitro lymphocyte proliferation to mitogens and MBP. Leukotrienes (LKT) elevate intracellular cGMP and amplify immune responses, the opposite of cAMP agonists. We found that LKT synthesis inhibitors blocked EAE, presumably by lowering levels of cGMP in inflammatory cells. Reduction of LKT synthesis enhanced the effects of misoprostol plus indomethacin on EAE. PGE analogs, indomethacin, and inhibitors of LKT synthesis block autoimmune responses to brain antigens in vitro and in vivo. Modification of intracellular cAMP and cGMP levels with these agents may ameliorate inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anthony T. Reder, Manjula Thapar, Anna Maria Sapugay, Mark A. Jensen. 1995. Eicosenoids Modify Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00045391-199509000-00020

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗