m-CPP hypolocomotion is selectively antagonized by compounds with high affinity for 5-HT(2C) receptors but not 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(2B) receptors.

Abstract

The ability of m-CPP [1-(m-chlorophenyl)piperazine] to produce hypolocomotion is well documented. This effect has been postulated to be due to activation of the 5-HT(2C) receptor. It is only recently that the tools necessary to clearly delineate which serotonin receptors are involved in the mediation of m-CPP hypolocomotion have become available. We investigated the effects of the selective 5-HT(2A) antagonists, MDL 100,907 and ketanserin, the selective 5-HT(2B) antagonists, LY 202146 and LY 266097, the 5-HT(2B/2C) antagonist, SB 206553, and the selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist, SB 242084 on m-CPP-induced hypolocomotion and spontaneous locomotor activity in mice. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of the non-selective serotonin antagonists, ritanserin, LY 53857, mianserin and cyproheptadine on m-CPP hypolocomotion. Additionally, receptor-binding studies were employed as an in vitro assessment of relative affinities at the 5-HT(2A), 5-HT92B) and 5-HT(2C) receptors. Antagonists tested alone were without effect on spontaneous activity, with the sole exception of ketanserin, which decreased spontaneous activity at the high dose of 1 mg/kg. m-CPP-induced hypolocomotion was not significantly attenuated by various doses of MDL 100,907, ketanserin, LY 202146, LY 266097, ritanserin or cyproheptadine. In contrast, SB 206553, SB 242084, LY 53857 and mianserin were capable of reversing m-CPP-induced hypolocomotion. Consistent with previous suggestions, a detailed pharmacological evaluation with selective antagonists for the 5-HT2 family of receptors supports a primary role for the 5-HT(2C) receptor, and not 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(2B) receptors, in mediating the hypolocomotion produced by m-CPP.