PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11866496

Twin delivery.

Abstract

The incidence of twin pregnancy has increased worldwide over the past 10 years largely as a consequence of the assisted reproductive technologies. Issues such as intrapartum monitoring and operative interventions, especially with regard to the second twin, provide a unique challenge in labour and delivery. Epidemiological data suggest that the term twin has a threefold higher mortality rate than the singleton. It is the authors' view that many aspects of twin delivery deserve as much import as those features of twin gestations such as pre-term birth and intrauterine growth restriction that, to date, have received much of the research and clinical interest in this area. Indications for elective Caesarean section are presented, incorporating new data derived from the delivery of the term singleton breech, and implications on the timing thereof are discussed. Vaginal delivery of both twins presenting by the vertex is recommended as safe as long as guidelines for the conduct of such delivery are followed. The recommended time interval between twins as well as the use of epidural, fetal monitoring and ultrasound in the delivery room are discussed. The second twin presenting as a non-vertex presents an urgent dilemma for accoucheurs. Data suggest that internal version and breech extractions are safer than external cephalic version provided that the appropriate techniques are applied. It is revealed, however, that the use of elective Caesarean section in this group of babies has not been subject to randomized controlled studies of sufficient power to determine the best method of delivery of the second twin - particularly in the low-birth-weight baby.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F R Barrett, W Knox Ritchie. 2002. Twin delivery.. https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2002.0254

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?].

The purpose of this article was to perform a critical analysis of publications having estimated the utility of X-ray pelvimetry, in order to allow tangible and useful conclusions for the clinical practice. X-ray pelvimetry was proposed in 3 indications: trial of labour among patients with a history of caesarean section, breech presentation, suspicion of cephalopelvic disproportion. The large majority of these publications are retrospective studies, studying a low number of patients and especially without control groups or randomisation. Their contradictory results and their methodological weaknesses do not allow any conclusion. Published randomised trials are exceptional. Among patients with a history of caesarean section, there is only one randomised trial; it demonstrates that ante-partum X-ray pelvimetry is not necessary prior to a trial labour in women with one previous caesarean section. It increases the caesarean section rate and is a poor predictor of the outcome of labour. There is also only one randomised trial which evaluated the interest of X-ray pelvimetry in patients with a breech presentation: the use of pelvimetry in breech presentation at term does not significantly reduce the overall caesarean-section rate, and does not improve the neonatal issues. However, it allows better selection of the delivery route, with a significantly lower emergency Caesarean-section rate. Finally, the only one randomised trial having studied the utility of X-ray pelvimetry for the prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion shows that pelvimetry is a poor predictor of the outcome of labour, has no influence on the neonatal issues and increases the caesarean sections rate. Furthermore, although radiation exposure during a X-ray pelvimetry is very weak, diagnostic X-ray studies during any stage of gestation have been shown to increase the risk of childhood cancer in the irradiated fetus. In the rare cases where pelvimetry is useful (trial of labour with a breech presentation), it is thus careful to perform a MRI pelvimetry.

Breech Presentation↗

French trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology theoretical training and practice of vaginal breech delivery: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: To survey French trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and evaluate their theoretical training and practice of vaginal breech delivery (VBD). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a national survey between January and April 2004 among the 817 French trainees undergoing a 5-year training program in obstetrics and gynaecology. Trainees in years 1-3 were considered as juniors, and those in years 4 and 5 as seniors. Respondents were invited to specify whether they had received theoretical teaching in the management of VBD, and to indicate the number of VBDs they had performed during their training. RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 156 (19%) trainees and of these 140 questionnaires were suitable for analysis. Overall, 35% of the respondents had never been taught the management of a VBD. Among the senior trainees, 33% had performed less than four VBDs, and 23% had not received any teaching on how to manage a VBD. CONCLUSION: The level of theoretical training and practice in the management of VBD seems to have diminished and does not bring the French trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology to the required standard of competence.

Breech Presentation↗