PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11876561

Vital statistics as a data source.

Abstract

A focus group convened at a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stillbirth Conference discussed issues related to vital statistics as a data source on fetal mortality. Fetal death is a tragic occurence and part of the continuum of pregnancy outcomes. A primary source of data is the National Vital Statistics System fetal death component, which is routinely used to track mortality trends and to provide the context for nonrepresentative investigations. The data are also used to examine differentials in mortality by characteristics and to evaluate data quality. Issues concerning how to improve the vital statistics data include culture and context; data instrument; persons providing information; what information is available to the information provider; processing issues; and use of data. Perhaps most important is to enhance recognition of fetal death both for the individual confronting a loss and to promote research. Other studies are needed to augment the information obtainable through vital records.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Donna L Hoyert, Joyce A Martin. 2002. Vital statistics as a data source.. https://doi.org/10.1053/sper.2002.29835

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Justifying the Justification Hypothesis: scientific-humanism, Equilintegration (EI) Theory, and the Beliefs, Events, and Values Inventory (BEVI).

The Justification Hypothesis (JH; Henriques, 2003) is a basic, general, and macro-level construct that is highly compelling. However, it needs greater specification (i.e., justification) regarding what it is, how it might be operationalized and measured, and what it does and does not predict in the real world. In the present analysis, the act of "justification" is conceptualized as the ongoing attempt to convince self and/or others that one's beliefs and values, which is to say one's "version of reality" or VOR, is correct, defensible, and good. In addressing these issues, this paper is divided into two complementary parts: (a) consideration of justification dynamics and exemplars from a scientific-humanist perspective and (b) an examination of how justification systems and processes have been studied vis-a-vis research and theory on beliefs and values as well as an extant model--Equilintegration (EI) Theory--and method--the Beliefs, Events, and Values Inventory (BEVI).

Culture↗