PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11887343

[External otitis].

Abstract

Otitis externa is one of the most common diseases in ORL practice, during summer; the treatment of otitis externa may be simple and easy or protracted and frustrating, also with fatal outcome. Many local factors may interfere with the normal defences against infections in the external auditory canal. Removing or dissolving the cerumen by water or other instruments eliminates an important barrier to infections: its acids inhibit the growth of bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and fungi (Aspergillus). Also skin abrasions or irritation, allergic diseases and many systemic condition like anaemia, vitamin deficiency, endocrine disorders (diabetes) and various forms of dermatitis cause a lower resistance to infections in external auditory canal. Even if the prognosis remains benign in the majority of cases, important complications could appear like: malignant otitis externa, facial nerve paralysis, tympanic bone osteomyelitis, pericondrytis. Successful treatment depends on a proper diagnosis and therapy: the most important factor in the treatment is repeated debridement of the external auditory canal by the physician. The use of Castellani' Tintura rubra, hydroalcoholic solution of phenic fuchsin, can be very effective for bacteria and mycotic eradication. Culturing of ear canal infection could be performed on the second or third visit if the otitis externa is not responding to therapy. Complication are not frequent, but malignant otitis externa can be mortal. Dermatological consultation is often necessary for correct diagnosis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Massimo Olina, Massimiliano Cametti, Chiara Guglielmetti, Massimo Gattoni, Giorgio Leigheb, Francesco Pia. 2002. [External otitis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11887343/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The contribution of ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of congenital and infantile nephrotic syndrome.

The aim of this study was to determine whether high-resolution ultrasound is able to differentiate between the various diseases associated with nephrotic syndrome (NS). We reviewed the US features of 15 patients less than 1 year presenting a NS whose exact type was defined by pathology nephrotic syndrome of Finnish type (NSFT, n=2); focal and segmental hyalinosis (FSH, n=3); minimal-change glomerular disease (MCGD, n=2); neonatal glomerulonephritis (n=1), and diffuse mesangial sclerosis (DMS, n=7). The US features studied included the size of the kidneys, cortical echogenicity, cortico-medullary differentiation (CMD), and borders. The images were reviewed on hard copies by two observers unaware of the final diagnosis. In each case a diagnosis was proposed based on the reading of the US features. Six patients with DMS displayed a peculiar US pattern: mild increase of renal size; and inhomogeneous (patchwork-like) parenchymal hyperechogenicity that included areas of the cortex and medulla. The NSFT and neonatal glomerulonephritis displayed some of the same US features: increased kidney size (+2 SD) and had homogeneous cortical hyperechogenity with persistent cortico-medullar differentiation. The kidneys in the 3 patients with SFH were sonographically normal (n=1) or displayed a mild cortical hyperechogenicity (n=2). Inhomogeneous parenchymal hyperechogenicity involving only segments of the cortex and medulla seems to be a specific US pattern for DMS. Ultrasound is less specific for the other types of CNS.

Diagnosis, Differential↗