PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11888125

Using a collaborative weaning plan to decrease duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive care unit for patients receiving long-term ventilation.

Elizabeth Henneman·Kathleen Dracup·Tomas Ganz·Orna Molayeme·Christopher B Cooper
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation for prolonged periods typically are sicker and have more comorbid illnesses than do patients who can be weaned more rapidly. As a result, the weaning process is often complex, requiring shared decision making by a skilled, multidisciplinary team. Unfortunately, many of the structures used in critical care units to plan and evaluate care do not lend themselves to collaborative management of patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a collaborative weaning plan on outcomes, including duration of mechanical ventilation, for patients treated with mechanical ventilation for 7 days or more. METHODS: A collaborative weaning plan (weaning board and flow sheet) was introduced into the medical intensive care unit at the University of California Los Angeles, Medical Center. A historical design was used to compare outcomes before and after the plan was used. The primary outcome variable was duration of mechanical ventilation. Other outcomes studied included length of stay in the unit, cost, prevalence of complications (ie, reventilation, readmission to the intensive care unit), and mortality rate. RESULTS: The collaborative weaning plan decreased duration of ventilation by 4.9 days (P=.02) and decreased median length of stay in the unit by 4.5 days (P=.004). The median cost per stay in the unit decreased from $50462 to $37330 (P=.004). The prevalence of complications did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative structures (eg, weaning boards, flow sheets) are useful in decreasing duration of mechanical ventilation for patients receiving long-term ventilation.

Explore related subjects

APACHEAdultChi-Square DistributionCooperative BehaviorCritical CareDecision Making, OrganizationalHospital CostsHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningPatient Care TeamPatient ReadmissionPrognosisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentilator WeaningJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Elizabeth Henneman, Kathleen Dracup, Tomas Ganz, Orna Molayeme, Christopher B Cooper. 2002. Using a collaborative weaning plan to decrease duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive care unit for patients receiving long-term ventilation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11888125/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

[Intrahospital mortality after discharge from the ICU (hidden mortality) in patients who required mechanical ventilation].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the hidden mortality (HM) in patients who underwent an episode of mechanical ventilation (MV). We also analyzed the factors associated with an increase in the risk of hidden mortality. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective cohort study. Patients admitted to an ICU who required MV and who were monitored until their discharge from hospital. We performed a multivariate study with a logistic regression model including all the variables that were present in a univariate analysis p < 0.20. RESULTS: Forty-one of the 215 patients who were discharged from the ICU died when they were admitted to hospital, which represents a hidden mortality rate of 19% (CI 95% 11%-27%). A mean period of 9 days elapsed between discharge from the ICU and patient's death, with 25% of patients dying within the first two days. Commonest cause of death was respiratory failure (37%). Factors independently associated with an increase in the risk of hidden mortality were (values expressed as adjusted odds ratio (CI 95%): age > 74 years 1.15 (1.01 to 1.26) (p = 0.02); APACHE II > 29 1.14 (1.01 to 1.27) (p = 0.04); reason for MV being coma 1.21 (1.07 to 1.37) (p = 0.002); reason for MV being cardiopulmonary arrest 1.28 (1.18 to 1.68) (p < 0.001); tracheotomy in ICU 1.31 (1.19 to 1.68) (p < 0.001) and stay in the ICU longer than 16 days 1.35 (1.01 to1.70) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: An important number of patients discharged from the ICU after an episode of MV die in hospital. Risk factors associated with an increased risk of death in hospital identify a group of patients who, after excluding those with non-cardiopulmonary resuscitation orders, would possibly benefit from high surveillance or intermediate care units.

APACHE↗
PubMed2003

Impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether PEEP during the first hours of ARDS can induce such a change in oxygenation that could mask fulfillment of the AECC criteria of a PaO(2)/FIO(2) </= 200 essential for ARDS diagnosis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational, prospective cohort in two medical-surgical ICU in teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: 48 consecutive patients who met AECC criteria of ARDS on 0 PEEP (ZEEP) at the moment of diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: PaO(2)/FIO(2) and lung mechanics were recorded on admission (0 h) to the ICU on ZEEP, and after 6, 12, and 24 h on PEEP levels selected by attending physicians. Lung Injury Score (LIS) was calculated at 0 and 24 h. PaO(2)/FIO(2) rose significantly from 121+/-45 on ZEEP at 0 h, to 234+/-85 on PEEP of 12.8+/-3.7 cmH(2)O after 24 h. LIS did not change significantly (2.34+/-0.53 vs. 2.42+/-0.62). These variables behaved similarly in pulmonary and extrapulmonary ARDS, and in survivors and nonsurvivors. After 24 h only 18 patients (38%) still had a PaO(2)/FIO(2) of 200 or lower. Their mortality was similar to that in the remaining patients (61% vs. 53%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PEEP improved oxygenation such that one-half of patients after 6 h, and most after 24 h did not fulfill AECC hypoxemia criteria of ARDS. However, LIS remained stable in the overall series. These results suggest that PEEP level should be taken into consideration for ARDS diagnosis.

APACHE↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted the present study to assess the validity of mortality prediction systems in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe sepsis and septic shock. We included Acute Physiology and Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, Mortality Probability Model (MPM) II0 and MPM II24 in our evaluation. In addition, SAPS II and MPM II24 were customized for septic patients in a previous study, and the customized versions were included in this evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This cohort, prospective, observational study was conducted in a tertiary care medical/surgical ICU. Consecutive patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for severe sepsis and septic shock during the first 24 hours of ICU admission between March 1999 and August 2001 were included. The data necessary for mortality prediction were collected prospectively as part of the ongoing ICU database. Predicted and actual mortality rates, and standardized mortality ratio were calculated. Calibration was assessed using Lemeshow-Hosmer goodness of fit C-statistic. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The overall mortality prediction was adequate for all six systems because none of the standardized mortality ratios differed significantly from 1. Calibration was inadequate for APACHE II, SAPS II, MPM II0 and MPM II24. However, the customized version of SAPS II exhibited significantly improved calibration (C-statistic for SAPS II 23.6 [P = 0.003] and for customized SAPS II 11.5 [P = 0.18]). Discrimination was best for customized MPM II24 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.826), followed by MPM II24 and customized SAPS II. CONCLUSION: Although general ICU mortality system models had accurate overall mortality prediction, they had poor calibration. Customization of SAPS II and, to a lesser extent, MPM II24 improved calibration. The customized model may be a useful tool when evaluating outcomes in patients with sepsis.

APACHE↗