PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11893055

Biomimetic selectivity.

Abstract

Synthetic organic chemistry normally achieves selectivity by manipulation of the intrinsic reactivity of the substrate, but enzyme use is quite a different principle. The geometry of the enzyme-substrate complex determines enzymatic selectivity, completely overwhelming any normal selective reactivities. Biomimetic chemistry aims to imitate the enzymatic style. Some early approaches used attached reagents or templates to direct photochemical and free radical processes, with a combination of geometric and reactivity control. Recent work uses a mimic of the enzyme class cytochrome P-450 to achieve the selective hydroxylations of steroids with complete domination by the geometry of the catalyst-substrate complex.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Breslow. 2001. Biomimetic selectivity.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1528-0691(2001)1%3A1%3C3%3A%3Aaid-tcr3%3E3.0.co%3B2-b

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

GTPase catalysis by Ras and other G-proteins: insights from Substrate Directed SuperImposition.

Comparisons of different protein structures are commonly carried out by superimposing the coordinates of the protein backbones or selected parts of the proteins. When the objective is analysis of similarities and differences in the enzyme's active site, there is an inherent problem in using the same domains for the superimposition. In this work we use a comparative approach termed here "Substrate Directed SuperImposition" (SDSI). It entails the superimposition of multiple protein-substrate structures using exclusively the coordinates of the comparable substrates. SDSI has the advantage of unbiased comparison of the active-site environment from the substrate's point of view. Our analysis extends previous usage of similar approaches to comparison of enzyme catalytic machineries. We applied SDSI to various G-protein structures for dissecting the mechanism of the GTPase reaction that controls the signaling activity of this important family. SDSI indicates that dissimilar G-proteins stabilize the transition state of the GTPase reaction similarly and supports the commonality of the critical step in this reaction, the reorientation of the critical arginine and glutamine. Additionally, we ascribe the catalytic inefficiency of the small G-protein Ras to the great flexibility of its active site and downplay the possible catalytic roles of the Lys16 residue in Ras GTPase. SDSI demonstrated that in contrast to all other Gly12 Ras mutants, which are oncogenic, the Gly12-->Pro mutant does not interfere with the catalytic orientation of the critical glutamine. This suggests why this mutant has a higher rate of GTP hydrolysis and is non-transforming. Remarkably, SDSI also revealed similarities in the divergent catalytic machineries of G-proteins and UMP/CMP kinase. Taken together, our results promote the use of SDSI to compare the catalytic machineries of both similar and different classes of enzymes.

Catalytic Domain↗

Crystal structure of DJ-1/RS and implication on familial Parkinson's disease.

DJ-1 is a protein involved in multiple physiological processes, including cancer, Parkinson's disease, and male fertility. It is unknown how DJ-1 functions in the apparently different systems. The crystal structure of DJ-1 at 1.6 A resolution shows that DJ-1 is a helix-strand-helix sandwich and forms a dimer. The DJ-1 structure is similar to the members of the intracellular protease PfpI family. However, the catalytic triad of Cys-His-Glu is not strictly conserved in DJ-1, implying that DJ-1 has a different catalytic mechanism if it acts as a protease or DJ-1 serves as a regulatory protein in the physiological processes. The structure shows that Leu166 positions in the middle of a helix and thus predicts that the L166P mutation will bend the helix and impact the dimerization of DJ-1. As a result, the conformational changes may diminish the DJ-1 binding with its partner, leading to the familial Parkinson's disease caused by the single L166P mutation.

Catalytic Domain↗

Insights into the mode of inhibition of human mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B from high-resolution crystal structures.

Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) is an outer mitochondrial membrane-bound enzyme that catalyzes the oxidative deamination of arylalkylamine neurotransmitters and has been a target for a number of clinically used drug inhibitors. The 1.7-A structure of the reversible isatin-MAO-B complex has been determined; it forms a basis for the interpretation of the enzyme's structure when bound to either reversible or irreversible inhibitors. 1,4-Diphenyl-2-butene is found to be a reversible MAO-B inhibitor, which occupies both the entrance and substrate cavity space in the enzyme. Comparison of these two structures identifies Ile-199 as a "gate" between the two cavities. Rotation of the side chain allows for either separation or fusion of the two cavities. Inhibition of the enzyme with N-(2-aminoethyl)-p-chlorobenzamide results in the formation of a covalent N(5) flavin adduct with the phenyl ring of the inhibitor occupying a position in the catalytic site overlapping that of isatin. Inhibition of MAO-B with the clinically used trans-2-phenylcyclopropylamine results in the formation of a covalent C(4a) flavin adduct with an opened cyclopropyl ring and the phenyl ring in a parallel orientation to the flavin. The peptide bond between the flavin-substituted Cys-397 and Tyr-398 is in a cis conformation, which allows the proper orientation of the phenolic ring of Tyr-398 in the active site. The flavin ring exists in a twisted nonplanar conformation, which is observed in the oxidized form as well as in both the N(5) and the C(4a) adducts. An immobile water molecule is H-bonded to Lys-296 and to the N(5) of the flavin as observed in other flavin-dependent amine oxidases. The active site cavities are highly apolar; however, hydrophilic areas exist near the flavin and direct the amine moiety of the substrate for binding and catalysis. Small conformational changes are observed on comparison of the different inhibitor-enzyme complexes. Future MAO-B drug design will need to consider "induced fit" contributions as an element in ligand-enzyme interactions.

Catalytic Domain↗