PubMed · 11894431
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Henriette Lipczak, Anne Frølich, Peter Qvist, Lisbeth Rasmussen. 2002-03-04. [Standards development--II].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11894431/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Whenever a physician is charged with negligence, the professional opinion of another doctor is always required. The quality of the expert report is a decisive factor in the quality of the ruling by the adjudicator. Three main problems may arise here: the medical expert may push up the professional standard, experts may differ in opinion, and finally their judgment may be influenced by prior knowledge of the outcome (hindsight bias). To avoid these problems, a systematic approach is needed, taking into account the scientific context, the clinical context, the procedure followed, the degree to which the outcome corresponds with the predicted outcome, reappraisal of the facts and the organisational context. In particular, the problem of hindsight bias through prior knowledge of the (unhappy) outcome highlights the need for greater attention to scientific and procedural aspects in the formation of an expert opinion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.