PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11901800

Molecular profiling of tissue samples using laser capture microdissection.

C J Best·M R Emmert-Buck
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The management of cancer and other genetically based diseases is far from optimal in even our most advanced medical centers. There is still uncertainty regarding how diseases will progress in certain patients, toxicity that must be tolerated with imprecise treatment regimens and significant potential for treatment failure. As our understanding of the complexity of these diseases has increased, it has become clear that we must move toward precisely tailored approaches to treating each individual patient. To that end, a major goal of current medical research is the rapid identification of the specific molecular alterations in each patient's disease. This will enable the design of optimal diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, significantly improving survival. This review describes one important approach to the genetic analysis of disease--molecular profiling--and the tenets and technologies necessary for its success.

Explore related subjects

DNA FingerprintingDissectionGenetic Diseases, InbornMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeoplasmsJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C J Best, M R Emmert-Buck. 2001. Molecular profiling of tissue samples using laser capture microdissection.. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.1.1.53

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Run-specific limits of detection and quantitation for STR-based DNA testing.

STR-based DNA profiling is an exceptionally sensitive analytical technique that is often used to obtain results at the very limits of its sensitivity. The challenge of reliably distinguishing between signal and noise in such situations is one that has been rigorously addressed in numerous other analytical disciplines. However, an inability to determine accurately the height of electropherogram baselines has caused forensic DNA profiling laboratories to utilize alternative approaches. Minimum thresholds established during laboratory validation studies have become the de facto standard for distinguishing between reliable signal and noise/technical artifacts. These minimum peak height thresholds generally fail to consider variability in the sensitivity of instruments, reagents, and the skill of human analysts involved in the DNA profiling process over the course of time. Software (BatchExtract) made publicly available by the National Center for Biotechnology Information now provides an alternative means of establishing limits of detection and quantitation that is more consistent with those used in other analytical disciplines. We have used that software to determine the height of each data collection point for each dye along a control sample's electropherogram trace. These values were then used to determine a limit of detection (the average amount of background noise plus three standard deviations) and a limit of quantitation (the average amount of background noise plus 10 standard deviations) for each control sample. Analyses of the electropherogram data associated with the positive, negative, and reagent blank controls included in 50 different capillary electrophoresis runs validate that this approach could be used to determine run-specific thresholds objectively for use in forensic DNA casework.

DNA Fingerprinting↗