PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11907463

Immunotherapy for melanoma.

Christina J Kim·Sophie Dessureault·Dimitry Gabrilovich·Douglas S Reintgen·Craig L Slingluff
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy for cancers is based on the principle that the host's immune system is capable of generating immune responses against tumor cells. Currently available treatments for melanoma patients are limited by poor response rates. Interferon-a has been approved for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma with improved survival. New and more innovative approaches with improved efficacy are needed. METHODS: We reviewed the various new approaches and strategies for immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma. RESULTS: Immunotherapy for melanoma includes a number of different strategies with vaccines utilizing whole cell tumors, peptides, cytokine-mediated dendritic cells, DNA and RNA, and antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of approaches can be used to enhance immune reactivity in patients with melanoma. Preclinical studies and initial clinical trials have shown promising results. Additional clinical trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the clinical efficacy and the associated toxicities of these novel treatment strategies.

Explore related subjects

Cancer VaccinesControlled Clinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, ActiveMaleMelanomaPrognosisRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySkin NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christina J Kim, Sophie Dessureault, Dimitry Gabrilovich, Douglas S Reintgen, Craig L Slingluff. Immunotherapy for melanoma.. https://doi.org/10.1177/107327480200900104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence for translational personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine development.

Personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine is a promising strategy for precision immunotherapy by targeting patient-specific and mutation-derived tumor antigens. Early clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and immunogenicity of these vaccines across multiple solid tumors, with encouraging outcomes particularly when combined with immune checkpoint blockade. However, broader clinical translation remains limited by sequential bottlenecks across the vaccine development pipeline, including false-positive neoantigen selection,  imperfect modeling of antigen processing and HLA presentation, limited prediction of T-cell receptor recognition, and challenges in formulation, delivery, and manufacturing. Artificial intelligence and advanced computational workflows are increasingly integrated into this pipeline to improve candidate prioritization and support more reproducible decision-making. In this review, we summarize clinical progress and key translational barriers in personalized neoantigen vaccination, and discuss how AI-enabled approaches may contribute across four major stages: multi-omics integration for neoantigen discovery, processing-aware HLA presentation prediction, structure-aware and TCR-informed immunogenicity modeling, and data-driven formulation optimization, particularly for lipid nanoparticle-based delivery systems. These approaches are able to help narrow biological and chemical search spaces, improve prioritization, and provide mechanistic insights into antigen presentation and immune recognition rather than replacing experimental validation. This articlefurther addresses future implementation challenges, including dataset diversity, model interpretability, prospective benchmarking, manufacturing traceability, and evolving regulatory frameworks for individualized mRNA cancer immunotherapies. Integrating computational innovation with rigorous immunological validation, scalable manufacturing, and regulatory oversight will be essential for advancing personalized neoantigen vaccines toward broader clinical implementation.

Cancer Vaccines↗
PubMed2025

A Programmable Nanovaccine Platform Based on M13 Bacteriophage for Personalized Cancer Vaccine and Therapy.

Nanovaccines co-assemble antigens and adjuvants to elicit robust immune responses but often require complex synthesis and post-modification procedures. Here, a programmable nanovaccine platform based on the M13 bacteriophage is developed for the scalable production of vaccines and single-step modular engineering of adjuvanticity, length, and antigen density. By reprogramming the sequence and size of the noncoding phage genome, the Toll-like receptor 9 activation and the length of the phage are precisely controlled. With a novel molecular engineering approach, the antigen density is tuned from 13.6% to 70.3%. A systematic modulation reveals an optimal adjuvanticity at a constant antigen density for maximum anti-tumor CD8+ T cell response, and vice versa, using the model antigen SIINFEKL. The M13 phage-based nanovaccine induces durable memory immunity lasting over a year. In addition, a 24-fold increase in neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cell frequency is achieved when increasing both the adjuvanticity and antigen density. Furthermore, when combined with anti-PD-1 therapy, the M13 phage-based personalized vaccine eradicates established MC-38 tumors in 75% of treated animals and they develop 100% resistance against tumor invasion when challenged 5 months after treatment. These findings establish M13 phage as a powerful and versatile nanovaccine platform with transformative potential for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Cancer Vaccines↗
PubMed2007

Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging of dendritic cells for in vivo tracking of cellular cancer vaccines.

Success of immunotherapy with dendritic cells (DC) to treat cancer is highly dependent on their interaction with and activation of antigen specific T cells. To maximize DC-T cell contact accurate delivery of the therapeutic cells into the lymph node, or efficient trafficking of DC to the lymph nodes of the patient is essential. Since responses are seen in some patients but not in others, monitoring of the injected cells may be of major importance. Tracking of cells with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a non-invasive method that provides detailed anatomical information and is therefore more informative for the evaluation of the localization of therapeutic cells after injection than e.g. scintigraphic imaging. To challenge the sensitivity of this novel technique, we investigated the minimum amount of label and the number of cells required for MR imaging and the effect of labeling on DC function. DC were labeled with different concentrations of a clinically approved MR contrast agent consisting of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles and were imaged at both 3 and 7 T. Our results demonstrate the following: (i) When loaded with 30 (+/-4) pg Fe/cell, cell numbers as low as 1,000 cells/mm3 at 3 T and 500 cells/mm3 at 7 T could be readily imaged; (ii) Labeling does not affect cell viability and function; (iii) Because of its high spatial resolution and sensitivity, MRI is ideally suited to track therapeutic cells in vivo.

Cancer Vaccines↗