PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11912945

Refractory chronic pain.

Michael R Clark·Todd S Cox
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Refractory chronic pain is a significant public health problem and frustrating to everyone affected by it. All physicians can participate in the care of these patients, but psychiatrists should take a leading role in their care. A comprehensive approach offers hope and increases the opportunities for successful treatment. Each perspective of an interdisciplinary formulation has a unique logic that defines specific methods for designing treatment for the patient with refractory chronic pain. The patient does not have to fit into one theoretic approach or model to receive and accept treatment. The patient's diagnoses are based on the formulation, which then directs treatment along rational directions. The linkages and interactions of a patient's diagnoses can then be investigated within a framework that includes the entire person and not just his or her biochemistry. If a patient's suffering persists, other factors must be considered that may have been overlooked before the treatment plan is abandoned or modified. Usually these factors are within one of the perspectives initially thought to be less important. A new combination of approaches is then required to treat the patient successfully. The perspectives appreciate not only that the patient is struggling through important life events but also that he is a person composed of vulnerabilities and strengths, having made many choices and afflicted by diseases.

Explore related subjects

Anxiety DisordersChronic DiseaseCombined Modality TherapyDepressive DisorderHumansLife Change EventsPainPain ManagementPatient Care TeamSomatoform DisordersJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael R Clark, Todd S Cox. 2002. Refractory chronic pain.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0193-953x(03)00053-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2008

Human and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder.

The goal of the current work is to provide a comprehensive review and interpretation of the literature on the human and economic burden of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and how it compares with that of other mental disorders. The term "human burden" is used to describe quantified impairments in role functioning and quality of life (QOL). "Economic burden" describes costs related to health care resource utilization and lost work. A review of 34 studies reporting original quantitative data on associations between GAD and role functioning, QOL, and/or economic costs was undertaken. GAD was defined by DMS-III-R, DSM-IV, or ICD-10 DCR. Persons with GAD (both with and without a comorbid mental disorder) described significant impairments due to both physical and emotional problems. Studies typically showed that role and QOL impairments of GAD were at least comparable in magnitude to those of other anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, and physical conditions, and greater than those of substance use disorders. Large representative studies showed that role impairments of pure GAD were similar in magnitude to those of pure MDD. Studies of DSM-IV disorders showed that QOL impairments of GAD were at least comparable in magnitude to those of MDD; studies of DSM-III-R disorders showed the opposite pattern. GAD was associated with considerable economic costs owing to lost work productivity and high medical resource use. Quality of care initiatives that have been implemented to increase recognition and improve treatment outcomes for persons with MDD should be extended to the effective management of GAD.

Anxiety Disorders↗
PubMed2007

Stress and anxiety associated with prenatal diagnosis.

Prior to any specific prenatal diagnostic procedure, the pregnant woman should be counselled about the indications for the procedure and how the diagnosis would inform care. In addition, the risks and limitations should be clearly spelt out. The availability of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures such as sonography appears to have led to a higher rate of acceptance of such procedures, especially in younger patients. The expectations of pregnant women and their partners concerning prenatal diagnosis focus on reducing uncertainty in regard to the normality of the pregnancy. However, any prenatal diagnostic procedure can cause emotional stress in the pregnant woman. There are two different types of stress in this situation. There may be anxiety about the invasive nature of the procedure and the attendant risk of the loss of a wanted pregnancy. There may also be anxiety over the outcome of the investigation. Any unexpected finding, especially an abnormal one, often has an adverse impact on the pregnant woman and her partner. Imaging of the unborn child on sonography, and revealing fetal movements and heartbeat, are increasingly a common and key experience in a pregnancy. With the advent of this now commonly shared experience, the male partner also gives up his roll as a passive onlooker and becomes more actively involved in the pregnancy. Couples require multidisciplinary care if an abnormal fetus is found.

Anxiety Disorders↗