PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11922696

Ischaemic brain oedema.

Abstract

Ischaemic brain oedema appears to involve two distinct processes, the relative contribution and time course of which depend on the duration and severity of ischaemia, and the presence of reperfusion. The first process involves an increase in tissue Na+ and water content accompanying increased pinocytosis and Na+, K+ ATPase activity across the endothelium. This is apparent during the early phase of infarction and before any structural damage is evident. This phenomenon is augmented by reperfusion. A second process results from a more indiscriminate and delayed BBB breakdown that is associated with infarction of both the parenchyma and the vasculature itself. Although, tissue Na+ level still seems to be the major osmotic force for oedema formation at this second stage, the extravasation of serum proteases is an additional potentially deleterious factor. The relative importance of protease action is not yet clear, however, degradation of the extracellular matrix conceivably leads to further BBB disruption and softening of the tissue, setting the stage for the most pronounced forms of brain swelling. A number of factors mediate or modulate ischaemic oedema formation, however, most current information comes from experimental models, and clinical data on this microcosmic level is lacking. Clinically significant brain oedema develops in a delayed fashion after large hemispheric strokes and is a cause of substantial mortality. Neurological signs appear to be at least as good as direct ICP measurement and neuroimaging in detecting and gauging the secondary damage produced by stroke oedema. The neuroimaging characteristics of the stroke, specifically the early involvement of greater than half of the MCA territory, are, however, highly predictive of the development of severe oedema over the subsequent hours and days. None of the available medical therapies provide substantial relief from the oedema and raised ICP, or at best, they are temporizing in most cases. Hemicraniectomy appears most promising as a method of avoiding death from brain compression, but the optimum timing and manner of patient selection are currently being investigated. All approaches to massive ischaemic brain swelling are clouded by the potential for survival with poor functional outcome. It is possible to manage blood pressure, serum osmolarity by way of selective fluid administration, and a number of other systemic factors that exaggerate brain oedema. Broad guidelines for treatment of stroke oedema can therefore be given at this time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cenk Ayata, Allan H Ropper. 2002. Ischaemic brain oedema.. https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.2001.1031

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients.

Using MRI techniques, we show here that normalization of tumor vessels in recurrent glioblastoma patients by daily administration of AZD2171-an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors-has rapid onset, is prolonged but reversible, and has the significant clinical benefit of alleviating edema. Reversal of normalization began by 28 days, though some features persisted for as long as four months. Basic FGF, SDF1alpha, and viable circulating endothelial cells (CECs) increased when tumors escaped treatment, and circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) increased when tumors progressed after drug interruption. Our study provides insight into different mechanisms of action of this class of drugs in recurrent glioblastoma patients and suggests that the timing of combination therapy may be critical for optimizing activity against this tumor.

Brain Edema↗

Third-trimester fetal MRI in isolated 10- to 12-mm ventriculomegaly: is it worth it?

OBJECTIVE: The justification for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in isolated mild ventriculomegaly remains controversial. This study was undertaken to evaluate the contribution of third-trimester MRI in isolated 10- to 12-mm fetal ventriculomegaly. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING: Universitary prenatal reference centre. POPULATION: From February 2000 to May 2005, we prospectively collected data concerning fetuses referred to us for cerebral MRI following detection of ventriculomegaly by ultrasound scan (n= 310). METHODS: Among these, we identified and analysed those cases in which ventriculomegaly was isolated and did not exceed 12 mm in ultrasound examinations prior to MRI scan (n= 185). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cases in which MRI provided additional information that was likely to have an impact on prenatal management were detailed. RESULTS: During the study period, 310 MRI were performed because of fetal ventriculomegaly. Hundred and eighty-five were suspected to be isolated 10- to 12-mm ventriculomegalies in ultrasound scan and formed our database. MRI confirmed the 10- to 12-mm isolated fetal ventriculomegaly in 106 cases (57.3%) and found other abnormalities in 5 (4.7%) of these 106 cases. MRI found ventricular measurement to be less than 10 mm in 43 cases (23.3%) and more than 12 mm in 36 cases (19.4%). Among these 36 fetuses with ventricle size more than 12 mm, 6 (16.7%) had other abnormalities, whereas MRI did not find other abnormalities in the 43 cases with ventricle size below 10 mm. CONCLUSION: Before advantages of MRI to ultrasound examination can be demonstrated, it seems reasonable that MRI should remain an investigational tool, restricted to selected clinical situations in which the results are expected to modify case management. Where ultrasound scan suspects isolated ventriculomegaly of 10 to 12 mm, our data suggest that when the finding is confirmed with MRI this could be expected in around 5% of cases. Therefore, the policy of routine MRI in such cases should depend on prenatal centres' priorities.

Brain Edema↗