PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11927899

Devising an effective general nursing continence assessment tool.

Abstract

Incontinence assessment forms are routinely used by nurses in order to implement the appropriate management, treatment and referral of patients suffering from bladder dysfunction. A thorough literature search using recognized databases revealed that no specific work has been carried out in respect of validating symptom scoring assessment tools for nurses. Validated symptom scores are available but these are generally used within specific areas of medicine, e.g. prostatic screening incorporates lower urinary tract symptom scores, and physiotherapy, to measure pelvic floor tone. This article examines the need for validity and symptom scoring within a general nursing incontinence assessment tool.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Winder. Devising an effective general nursing continence assessment tool.. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2001.10.14.5282

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Retained foreign bodies from the view of the OR nurse].

Patient safety in the operating room is of high priority for the surgical team and for all healthcare workers involved. Counting procedures contribute to minimizing potential risks for the patients, especially in preventing them from leaving the operating room with retained, unintended foreign bodies. A total of 64% of operating room nurses involved in a survey are reported as having been involved in a surgical procedure in which the correct count prevented foreign bodies from being left in the patient. In addition, the strengths and potential weak points of the counting procedures could be identified. The results of the survey and drafts for a standard counting control as well as procedural recommendations are presented for discussion. A recommendation can be provided for each surgical department in order to check their own counting methods for avoiding potential risks.

Documentation↗