PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11940027

Clinical elements for the neuromuscular stimulation and functional electrical stimulation protocols in the practice of neurorehabilitation.

Abstract

The physicians and their multidisciplinary teams involved in the clinical practice of neurological rehabilitation have more and more opportunities to apply neuromuscular stimulation (NMS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) of peripheral nerves as a part of their daily practice. In this article, we outline clinical protocols of NMS and FES in the following clinical conditions of upper motor neuron dysfunction: to prevent consequences of disuse of the neuromuscular system of the upper motor neuron, to facilitate recovery processes of impaired upper motor neuron functions due to acute and/or subacute neurological conditions, to maintain or enhance the trophic state of the muscle, to modify altered control of muscle tone, to modify altered patterns of automatic and volitional functional movements, to enhance functional movement of the single joint muscle group within intact functional multijoint movement, and to modify altered neurocontrol of posture, locomotion, and skillful movements. We emphasize the importance of understanding the motor control alteration while developing clinical protocols and defining the goals. It is very important to be aware that similar clinical findings and due to the same cause can have different features of residual motor control, and therefore potentials for recovery or modification can be very different.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Meta M Dimitrijevic, Milan R Dimitrijevic. 2002. Clinical elements for the neuromuscular stimulation and functional electrical stimulation protocols in the practice of neurorehabilitation.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06946.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Modeling biological motor control for human locomotion with functional electrical stimulation.

This paper develops a novel control system for functional electrical stimulation (FES) locomotion, which aims to generate normal locomotion for paraplegics via FES. It explores the possibility of applying ideas from biology to engineering. The neural control mechanism of the biological motor system, the central pattern generator, has been adopted in the control system design. Some artificial control techniques such as neural network control, fuzzy logic, control and impedance control are incorporated to refine the control performance. Several types of sensory feedback are integrated to endow this control system with an adaptive ability. A musculoskeletal model with 7 segments and 18 muscles is constructed for the simulation study. Satisfactory simulation results are achieved under this FES control system, which indicates a promising technique for the potential application of FES locomotion in future.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗

Complications and troubleshooting of two-stage sacral neuromodulation therapy: a single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVES: With the increasing use of sacral neuromodulation therapy, urologists are faced with postimplantation challenges. The purpose of this study was to identify these events and their causes and management in our large single-institution experience. METHODS: From July 2002 to September 2004, all patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation therapy for refractory bladder conditions were identified. Their medical records were retrospectively evaluated for history, operative intervention, and programming visits. Events after implantation of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) unit were noted. The evaluation, troubleshooting, management, and resolution of events at the last follow-up visit were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients underwent sacral neuromodulation therapy at our institution. The mean patient age was 53.5 +/- 15.4 years. Of the 214 patients, 161 underwent IPG implantation during a mean follow-up period of 16 months (range 5 to 30). The second-stage explantation and revision rate was 10.5% and 16.1%, respectively. The indications for explantation were infection (8 of 17) and failure to maintain a response (9 of 17). Revisions were done for decreases in response with abnormal (12 of 26) or normal (5 of 26) impedance measurements, IPG site discomfort (4 of 26), draining sinus at the IPG site (4 of 26), and lead migration (1 of 26). Equalization of impedance measurements was the most commonly observed impedance abnormality. These were managed by drying fluid from the connection in 4 patients and lead change in the rest. CONCLUSIONS: After IPG implantation, a decline in response may occur. Although some were explanted, most were revised, with most of the revisions functional on follow-up. Familiarity with impedance evaluation and development of algorithms for postimplant management are essential for troubleshooting and maintenance of the device.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗