PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11964207

Should we routinely test for simultaneous location and scale changes?

Abstract

It is argued that in many circumstances, there is no compelling reason to believe that measurements from several experimental groups have the same variability. If it is plausible that the variabilities may differ, a statistical test sensitive to changes of scale as well as to changes of location should be selected. Some references to such tests are given.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T P Hutchinson. 2002-02-20. Should we routinely test for simultaneous location and scale changes?. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130110116632

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for quantification of allele ratios and correction of amplification bias.

Allele-specific epigenetic modifications are crucial for several important biological functions, including genomic imprinting and X-inactivation in mammals. Consequently, an ever increasing number of investigations requires accurate quantification of the relative abundance of parental alleles of a specific sequence in a DNA sample. Here, combining the use of polymorphic restriction sites with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, we describe a simple and quantitative assay to measure allele ratios. The efficiency of the assay was assessed on genomic DNA for several polymorphic restriction sites located in the mouse Igf2/H19 imprinted locus. The assay was also successfully applied to quantify allele ratio in cDNA samples. In addition, we provide an experimental procedure for detection and correction of potential PCR amplification bias which significantly extends the range of application of the assay.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗