PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 11964787

Differential white blood cell count: underutilized or overrated.

Dennis L. Stevens·Richard K. Root·Henry Rosen·David C. Dale
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Editorial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dennis L. Stevens, Richard K. Root, Henry Rosen, David C. Dale. 2000. Differential white blood cell count: underutilized or overrated.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001432-200006000-00001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Challenges of Using Circulating Tumour DNA: Insights from Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Precision oncology relies on integrating tumour fraction, variant allele frequency, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential assessment, pathogenicity, and clinical context into next-generation sequencing interpretation, enabling biologically informed and clinically meaningful treatment decisions while reducing the risk of overinterpreting nontumour or nonactionable genomic alterations.

Editorial↗