PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11973325

Considerations on study designs using the extreme sibpairs methods under multilocus oligogenic models.

Abstract

Several issues pertinent to study designs employing extreme sibpairs (ESP) methods to detect complex oligogenic quantitative trait loci (QTL) are investigated in the setting of genome-wide multipoint scans. We demonstrate that when stringent alpha-levels are imposed (e.g., alpha = 0.00022 as recommended by Landers and Kruglyak), the power to detect a susceptibility locus could drop from 83.6% under a one-locus model down to a hopeless 22.8% under a two-locus model of the same heritability h(2) = 0.5 and gene frequency (p = 0.1). We introduce the notion of joint power that is the power to detect linkage to at least one location over a given panel of markers across a genomic region and describe the effect of several design factors on such joint power in a multipoint scan. Moreover, power of analysis conditional on the IBD sharings of ESPs at a known/detected locus is examined and shown to increase substantively (to 93.3% under the previous two-locus model) in detecting novel trait loci. We conclude that with such remedies, the ESP design continues to be a relatively powerful design for mapping oligogenic QTL. However, when the effect of individual contributing loci becomes less tractable, especially when their contributions are "asymmetric," deliberation on balancing two types of statistical errors and a careful examination of possible contributions from multiple genetic factors and/or interaction effects are a must in designing an efficient study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chi Gu, D C Rao. 2002. Considerations on study designs using the extreme sibpairs methods under multilocus oligogenic models.. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics%2F160.4.1733

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗