PubMed · 11974217
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Williams. Beating pain.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.14.43.25.s42
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
UNLABELLED: We report on a 51-year-old female with a 7 year history of breast cancer. In August 2000 surgical replacement of the 8th thoracic vertebra was performed. From November 2000 the patient developed progressive pain, due to additional spine metastases, leading to pain therapy (according to the patient record) as follows: MST 320 mg oral 4 times daily, Durogesic 100 micrograms/h transdermal, Sevredol 40 mg oral 3 times daily and Ibuprofen 800 mg oral 3 times daily. Due to the risk of spinal instability and persisting pain a thoracic spondylodesis from Th 4-L2 was performed. Parallel to arrival in the PACU the patient developed extremely intensive pain. Pain control was achieved by fractional injection of overall 660 mg morphine in the first 120 min. After interviewing the patient, opioid consumption surprisingly turned out to be 60% higher than presumed. Pain therapy was continued by infusion and PCA with morphine in a daily intravenous dosage of 600-800 mg. Consecutively the pain therapy was switched to oral morphine and co-analgesics and the patient was discharged home 14 days postoperatively. PROBLEM: Some patients with chronic cancer pain are used to increased opioid dosages prior to planned surgery. In the perioperative setting these dosages have to be continued and adapted to current requirements, otherwise analgesic undersupply occurs. In our case report we describe a serious sequence of postoperative analgesic undersupply in an opioid consuming patient. The main principles of post-operative dosing and logistic pitfalls are illustrated.
A sufficient analgesic treatment in the early postoperative period is important for the patients comfort level. Moreover, physical therapy for prophylaxis of pneumonia and thrombosis is better tolerated. In a prospective study, we compared two postoperative pain management regimens to establish a sufficient pain management without the need of additional costs or manpower. Of 215 patients undergoing major urologic surgery, 111 patients received on demand medication exclusively (group 1), whereas 104 patients were treated with basic analgesics combined with on demand medication (group 2). Pain intensity, side effects and subjective well being were evaluated with a visual analogue scale and a standardised interview. Pain intensity and side effects were significantly lower in group 2. Thus, with combined analgesic treatment, postoperative pain relieve can be achieved safely and without additional costs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.