PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 11990708

Testing new agents: can we move beyond DLT?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert J Arceci. 2002. Testing new agents: can we move beyond DLT?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043426-200202000-00001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Mutagenesis of the HMGB (high-mobility group B) protein Cmb1 (cytosine-mismatch binding 1) of Schizosaccharomyces pombe: effects on recognition of DNA mismatches and damage.

Cmb1 (cytosine-mismatch binding 1) is a high-mobility group (HMG) protein of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which consists of 223 amino acids and has a single HMG domain at the C-terminal end. We have created several mutant and deletion forms of the Cmb1 protein and studied the effects on general DNA binding and specific binding to DNA mismatches and damaged DNA. Cmb1Delta41 (i.e. Cmb1 from which the 41 N-terminal amino acids have been deleted) bound specifically to cytosine-containing mismatches, to the cisplatin-induced intrastrand cross-links cis -GG and cis -AG and to an O (6)-methylguanine lesion. DNA binding was not affected when the 45 N-terminal amino acids were deleted, but was abolished in the absence of the 50 N-terminal amino acids, and was reduced when Cmb1 was truncated by between five and eleven C-terminal amino acids. Cmb1, both with and without the C-terminal truncations, retained its DNA binding affinity after heating at 95 degrees C. The cmb1 gene was induced when S. pombe cells were treated with cisplatin. Mitotic mutation rates were increased in a S. pombe cmb1 null mutant and in a cmb1-(1-212) mutant, which encodes a Cmb1 protein lacking the 11 C-terminal amino acids. We conclude that mutation avoidance by Cmb1 is distinct from Msh2-dependent mismatch repair, but related to nucleotide excision repair.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Prinomastat, a hydroxamate inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases, has a complex effect on migration of breast carcinoma cells.

Membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) and alphavbeta3 integrin have been directly implicated in tumor cell dissemination and metastasis. We have demonstrated that in the case of breast carcinoma MCF7 cells co-expressing MT1-MMP and alphavbeta3 integrin, the proteinase processes the pro-alphav integrin subunit, thus facilitating alphavbeta3 integrin maturation and cell migration on vitronectin. Our findings show that cell surface MT1-MMP is a short-lived protein with a life span in the range of several hours. In contrast, turnover of alphavbeta3 integrin is much slower. The half-life of alphavbeta3 heterodimer is about 24 hr. This large difference in life span allowed us to distinguish between the effects of MT1-MMP on cell migration brought by matrix proteolysis from those imposed through alphavbeta3 integrin maturation. We then modulated the enzyme's activity by a potent hydroxamate MMP inhibitor, Prinomastat (AG3340), to analyze the divergent effects of MT1-MMP on cell migration. Although Prinomastat immediately blocked MT1-MMP-mediated matrix degradation, the pool of MT1-MMP-modified alphavbeta3 integrin molecules was still capable of mediating cell-matrix interactions. To our considerable surprise, inhibition of MT1-MMP-dependent vitronectin proteolysis by Prinomastat allowed a several-fold increase in migration of MCF7 cells co-expressing MT1-MMP and alphavbeta3 integrin. In contrast, long-term Prinomastat inhibition of MT1-MMP-dependent pro-alphav cleavage and thus alphavbeta3 integrin maturation strongly inhibited cell motility. Our studies suggest that MT1-MMP could actually promote cell migration via modification of the cell surface receptors, including alphavbeta3 integrin, rather than facilitate cell migration through direct cleavage of the matrix proteins.

Antineoplastic Agents↗